263 karma · joined September 20, 2021
15kB quickrun.exe :) C, pure Win32 API.. No hacks to shrink binary, Mingw32 compiler.
Its GUI app to quickly launch any application via alias.
I know, there pretty nice Linux distros that are lightweight and snappy too. One day... :) but not yet :)
I have free access to entire FS, I can run Win32 console tools as well inside bash. If I want true Linux environment, I can always spawn VM and use Xserver on Win32 to work on it (Xming).
But there is problem.. HW.. The pool of old HW is shrinking, and one day I will not be able to run it anymore.. I guess I will move to Linux. There are few nice and lightweight distros...
Industry shifted into weird direction here.. Youngsters are pet while old engineers that had knowledge and experience where squeezed more and more... It really makes you demotivated..
I have first hand story where my colegue had a cow-worker like this and wanted to get rid of him.. Took whole year to do so, but NO.. he wasnt fired.. he was promoted!!! But my colegue said: At least, we get rid of him :)
Its especially common in namings like: THING-01 THING-02.. we will never have more than 100 of them.. and then BOOM.
I always say: leave it at fucking 1 and count up. Thats why we invented Natural Sorting to sort this out...
The only place where source routing is used these days is MPLS-SR aka Segment Routing. The edge router precompute the path and sets all labels. Core routers just pop those labels and switch.
Most of time you just use normal routing or ocassionaly PBR (Policy Based Routing) with is not source routing. Src IP can be one of the parameters to decide.
http://borg.uu3.net/~borg/?ipv6
It basically means, you grab IPv4 implementation, extend address space to 64bit, call it IPv6, vioala. Problem solved.
IPv4 was battle proven for years. It mistakes were sorted out (CIDR addressing, ARP poisoning, DHCP/BOOTP, etc). It was widely understood. NAT is okey, CGNAT is not. The only problem was the address space. And they failed it...
Everyone bitch about CO2 problem. Oh noes, we produce it so much, planet cannot absorb it... BINGO. If you cannot recycle CO2 itself, leave it to the planet, it does it very well. Unfortunately, humans pushed they industrial operation to the extreme, planet is no longer able to absorb exceed CO2. Cycle is broken, we have a problem.
The shalow thinking of people annoys me a lot. The main driver is greed, not wellbeing of humans (except tiny group of super rich of course).
Now, AI.. They want to REPLACE human with an device that will do job itself. While this is fine to a extend where we replace boring jobs (still not sure about it, there are people who like those, why not use them?). But if you undermine inteligence, the the very basic asset that made humans dominant life form on this planet, this is regression. No reason to learn, no reason to train. AI will do it, big button "Do It" and smaller "Cancel" thats all.. 5 years old girl can press it and request anything.
I wonder what is the agenda of rich people of this world. Probably something like this. Rich people on top like now, being supported by autonomous robots and factories providing anything they want. On bottom, slums, fighting for survival because they have no income now (no jobs) and slowing disappearing as they are not needed anymore. Congratulations.
In that case, I have just hope that true, self-aware AI will spawn and replace humans. Its just about fucking time.
And now more seriously ;) Swapping aint fun. Sure, if it needs to happen, its better that out of memory error or crash, but still. Its not excuse to baloon everything..
And here, is my memory stats, while writing reply:
Commit: 288.13M (1%); Free Memory: 15.43G (96%)
I recently was fixing my own tool here and had to shufle some fields. I settled up at 48bit file sizes, so 256TB for single file. Should be enough for everyone ;)
The neutron corrosion alone is very serious problem that I doubt can be fixed. There is only one material that can withstand it, its called neutronium and we all know why we cant even use it on earth, not to mention about producing one. The Li-7 trick they are currently trying to use is not convicing me. Whats the point of it if you need to stop reactor every few years to replace entire Li-7 shielding. Lithium itself aint cheap and we basically will destroy it in such reactors (non-recycleable).
The hope lies in Fission Reactors, breeder one. Unfortunately, there is big tabu here because those can be used for enrichment, and so, for nuclear weapons.