620 karma · joined February 1, 2019
If it happens a lot and without a given reason it certainly does, but it isn't such a black and white issue that it has to be stopped at all costs. When someone points out very suspicious patterns over multiple names, comments, similar threads that are more likely to have astroturfing or bots etc. and mods pop in to say not to talk about astroturfing and bots because it doesn't happen, that's not helping keep the site to a higher standard.
I don't doubt it is a priority and people are working on it, and I don't think the reply here that has no examples is worthwhile, but an all or nothing attitude doesn't help, because it is the reality of the internet.
Think about an account that is active 24/7 every day all year, or one that fires off multiple actions per second for long periods of time.
Beyond that, having a limited vocabulary, repetitive phrases, consistently accessing the same thing every few minutes, etc. are all low hanging fruit.
It would be much better to show useful statistics to convince people that bots are kept to a minimum.
It can be abused but most of the time is extremely convenient. Iostream and boost set a terrible example however. Boost especially goes into the deep end on templates, operators, crazy dependencies, unacceptable compile times etc. It really isn't fair to judge modern C++ on boost. Instead of being batteries included, boost is now more a last resort.
It is a lot like a bubble sort in that it is O(n^2) and is useful in practice on tiny sets and as a benchmark.
(Also that link is very cool, but it looks closer to n-rooks / latin hypercube sampling in that it used a grid, which means it won't work in higher dimensions)
You can't hallucinate some new definition for being overwhelmed and then say New York hospitals weren't overwhelmed. That is not rational.