A vulnerability found in Google’s implementation of SPF in Gmail. The company is prioritizing a fix.
923 karma · joined April 30, 2014
A vulnerability found in Google’s implementation of SPF in Gmail. The company is prioritizing a fix.
YouTube plays full music content on their site and shows ads on top of it.
Whereas Facebook, Reddit, or Twitter link to the sites. You can’t consume that content in the same way that you can music videos on YouTube.
I remember a time when music videos and magazines were the leading causes of teen mental health decline.
Also, what is social media? My nieces and nephews spend more time on messaging than they do on TT or IG.
Let’s say we get rid of TT and IG, do we think that all the issues surrounding YA mental health will go away?
Moral panic has always sold newspapers.
I'm not saying you're wrong but I think this perspective has helped me see things a bit differently.
My oldest was upset that her friend didn’t acknowledge a message she had sent and apparently changed the topic. Apparently this friend always does that. My daughter was complaining that it is unlikely that this person didn’t see the message that my daughter had sent.
It is a complex world. I just live in it. I will never understand the subtle nuanced rules. I’ve made my peace with it. I just listen.
However, even within their close circle of friends, I see the same social issues (peer pressure, need for validation, etc.).
I wonder how many people in the US will use TikTok if the rules require government censorship and data sharing.
They solve a real world problem of ownership of digital assets in an interesting way. We need a solution here and NFTs proposed an "open" one. I wish we keep exploring this space.
Do you think Apple and Foxconn are paying Indian women time and a half for hours above 40?
That said, I'm nearly 100% certain that these women would rather have these jobs working in a clean facility than the alternative.
This is the amount of money Google pays to third parties to get traffic into its services.
It isn't like Google's advertising model was a secret or difficult to envision where it was going.
If that wasn't a problem when you sold out, why is it a problem now? Or if you were already worried about this, why'd you sell to Google?
Heat pumps are much better for the environment compared to the other sources of heating. Depending on where you live, you still need to heat your place and if so, heat pumps are better than other traditional methods like natural gas, wood, oil, or electricity.
Similar to air conditioning, if you want to minimize your impact on the climate, you could set your temperature lower in the winter and put on a few more layers and/or set the temperature higher in the summer to minimize your usage of heat pump/air conditioner. This puts less pressure on the grid and demand for electricity generation.
Snap's focus on salacious content turned off a lot of my friends. People wanted something a bit more wholesome than Snap but not as sterile as Instagram. TikTok fit the bill perfectly.
These are both self feeding machines. Protestors go to Davos because they get media coverage. WEF, while not directly supporting protestors, also benefits from the coverage of protests because it keeps an otherwise unnecessary forum in the news.
Also, what's social media? Are messaging apps not social media?
This feels like another one of those 'violent video games are bad' arguments.
Additionally, this didn’t really touch “mainstream” investors in the US.
Is that not right?
I was laid off from a non-tech company in 2006-2007. There was no message from the CEO, no public admission of fault, etc.
We knew the layoffs were coming. On the Friday of the layoff, my manager came around and took me to the HR office. I stood in line with others to sign some paperwork. I was then escorted back to my desk to collect my things and walked outside. My commute was about 1.5 hr and had I known, I wouldn't even have bothered showing up. The company laid off about 15% of its workforce. There wasn't any sign of contrition on part of the CEO. Heck even the HR people didn't seem to care.
Perhaps our standard of how to do these have changed?
For example, I'd be willing to bet that most household don't even have candles or a battery operated flashlight.
When power has been nearly 100% reliable for as long as you've been alive, there's no reason for you to worry about those things and you don't build that resilience.
Someone in Alaska is probably more prepared for surviving a power outage than someone in Manhattan. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that life might continue as normal far longer in remote areas than it would in big cities in the event of a major outage.
Interesting take.
So, a third party decides to use Meta's advertising tools. Why is this Meta's fault? Why not the third-party?
Also, if these companies are willing to send this data to Meta, did you stop and ask where else they might be sending it?