CheezeIt

At least among those that can land a jury in San Francisco.

No it can’t.

Obviously not, that’s why I specified tax software.

What’s your point?

No way would I ever trust open source tax software not to mess things up somehow. The paid software has a big incentive to get it right.

He does have an account here.

swordsmiths. It looks like that typo was fixed.

It’s not even a statistical argument. This doesn’t even make it to the part where there’s a fake proof. It’s just… a bunch of stuff.

What I mean is, the Craigslist section for rooms/shared might allow the word “male” while it’s prohibited in other rental categories. But maybe it’s harsher if the user makes multiple postings, if something like that distinguishes landlords from renters.

Are you doing rooms/shared or apartments? They might have a different filter.

Making it easier to require people to carry papers is not beneficial.

Tipper Gore and FDR weren’t liberal?

The Soviets were going to do it in a few years anyway. Maybe it would not be as quickly as they got it done. Japan even had a wisp of a program. Everybody knew that an atom bomb program was a thing to do.

At the barest minimum, we would still develop nuclear reactors, and then plutonium would get discovered, and it’s easy to manufacture and purify (compared to U-235), and the bomb is just a matter of time.

Tell it to get a job or go to college.

And you’re complaining about what? That the productive 10% are doing useful stuff for each other, making their lives better?

They make the world a better place by providing products and services for their customers.

That’s because there’s case law.

It wouldn’t work if the Democrats didn’t want to spend an infinite amount of money.

The parent is talking about how the market price is above MSRP right now.

The one with the time and running chronograph has drop shadows on the subdial hands and some reflections of the chrono seconds register off the dial, but no reflection of the chrono seconds off the hour and minute hands.

It’s a single ledger of transaction history that is public instead of private.

> Why are people so surprised and or angered by this?

People have self respect and don’t like being bossed around by nitwits and parasites in mega corporations.

Who’s on the other end of that options trade?

When you’re confused, that means there is something wrong with your model of reality.

Those requirements are for seriously lethal or damaging diseases that weren’t going away. COVID-19 has reached its last major peak in late August.

The culture may have changed, but the way I meant was first, with small IPOs is that the founders may expect exponential growth post-IPO, and that gets cut short, and second, it’s much easier to hostile takeover small companies. Whether it’s Amazon or Dunkin Donuts. Instead the company’s older, founders are more tired, the payout’s higher, and (I assume) being more expensive, they’re less common.

I would guess companies now keep voting power among insiders after IPO with special share classes instead of incorporating in odd states, if they’re inclined to avoid a takeover.

When it comes to the modern day version of this sort of drama, the first thing that comes to mind is pre-exit startup founders losing control. That’s still a thing.

One factor here may be that due to Sarbanes-Oxley companies aren’t IPOing at small market caps anymore.

This is multiply wrong. First, it’s not “worth it” to bring in $100 at a cost of $99. The government is already inefficiently burning wealth when it brings in money at $0 overhead, and now you’re multiplying that by 100. If bringing money into the government were intrinsically good, you could just raise taxes.

Second, this has to be balanced with the taxpayer’s costs of being audited.

What is good and the purpose of tax enforcement is that the system runs as the law defines it and is “fair” in the sense that everybody has to obey the law, without exception.

I don’t know about probable cause for a search, but legally speaking, clamming up to a specific question, as opposed to explicitly invoking the 5th amendment right, currently means something in trial, as ruled in Salinas v. Texas.

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-246

I don’t see how telling the officer you have $87k is probable cause for a search, anyway.

It’s not about turning a profit.