ChoHag

If your subconscious is triggering on things you don't want it trigging on, it's a liability not an asset. Your OWN BRAIN is a LIABILITY. People are OK with that?

If your brain is not working right it should be retrained so that it is. This site is supposed to be full of programmers and engineers. How the fuck can anyone in here not know how to reprogramme their own brain?

How about not making it a race and just learning the shit out of any one algorithm at a time?

The chance of an invisible magic snaphotting system not invisibly breaking the 'back-to-basics' assumptions is precisely zero, invalidating any tests performed within or by it.

Developing against a known state and always and only testing against that state is easy and has been since approximately always. Not doing it is lazy. Stop guessing, developers, programme!

The number of people in this thread not merely nodding their heads and mmhmm-ing (or the internet equivalent) is a concern.

A library which uses the same (built-in) underlying IO mechanisms as the (built-in) filesystem.

Encryption is not a panacea. It's not a magic button that makes everything it touches "Secure!".

You see that computer in front of you with its internet connection?

All the things you don't think about, and most of the ones you do, work together the way they do because of the IETF.

You see those other things that don't work together? Those are the ones the IETF didn't do.

We already did the containerisation of everything (except we didn't lie to ourselves and just called them the processes they are) and discovered flaws along the way, fixing most of them.

Docker wants to find the flaws on its own, so is repeating the last ~30 years of software distribution development.

Every problem containerisation discovers has been discovered. Every flaw it fixes has been fixed. All that is achieved by the modern insistence that containerisation is in any way something new is a larger attack surface. The ability to return to "some fixed point" has always been present and simple. Judging by many years of building other people's software, for fun or profit, developers simply don't bother to do so. None of my work is ever release without returning the system to a known state in order to run the necessary barrage of tests (which, developers take note, includes TESTING THE GOD-DAMN INSTALLATION DOCUMENT) and I've achieved this without the need for chroot, whatever its name du juor.

/rant

I suggest a dose of reality:

You can't. You may be able to consume the knowledge underpinning an algorithm and parrot it back but any attempt to learn it in one day is doomed to failure. Parrot knowledge has zero retention.

The stronger the government, the more they succeed?

Your subconscious should work for you, not the other way around. If it's requesting attention that's not needed, it's faulty and should be fixed.

It can basically be summed up as "Docker! Now with hypervisors!"

Didn't we agree that 2016 was the year of the Linux Desktop?

Why do these things need your attention now, even before it has been explicitly requested?

That was indeed the only thing I decided I didn't want to allow myself to put up with.

It's certainly easier to start with groups who only participate in activities which are uncomfortable to publicly defend.

And taste of nothing more then exactly as much salt as it is topped with, without even the benefit of a crunch of the slice of toast which is unable to hold its own under the onslaught of up-bulking water released during the cooking^Wboiling process (and wouldn't be able to even without the water because modern bread is so laughably unbreadlike).

I'm happy to pay for food. I like paying for food. I like it to be food.

Some airports are relenting, but you must stand.

If the only thing I need to do is show up at a door at a time, why do I need to sit in front of wall-to-wall advertising for hours first?

Why, in short, do I need to wait at all?

Until you've got enough leaves and other detritus, there won't be any ground.

Is it a crime to require that a person commits a crime before being admitted into a private club?

> in some past periods, people did not have "identification papers"

You mean last century? People are still alive from then.

Leave it long enough to grow it into more tomatoes.

I can't remember now. Spies and spying I think it was.

It's useful for gaining a foothold over the potential customers who would be scared off at the need to upgrade all their equipment in order to watch the films they can already watch. Give it time.

Well it has a Q in it. What's not cool about that?? Of course it's next!

(DNR)

In case anyone was wondering, don't use this to do your encryption. It's an (interesting) intellectual exercise, nothing more.

> You could, but a relational database isn't distributed upon 5,000+ worldwide nodes in an immutable data ledger.

The DNS would like a word.

It totally is, and the computers they use should not have working USB ports on them.

Seems she made a literal black box.