34 karma · joined August 15, 2016
Microsoft is under absolutely no obligation to support Windows 7. Those "many people" should and will be forced to upgrade, otherwise a substitute will appear and rake over their jobs/company/market.
And why should they? If you don't agree with their moral compass, then don't invest or support them. By laws of nature, they will eventually die away if it is unsustainable. However, I'd wager it is highly sustainable hence their continued existence. This has happened throughout all of human history.
Spoiler: Tensorflow wins.
No, they didn't. They likely were interviewed by the hiring manager. Which, a hiring manager of an internal tools team, does not face the public scrutiny of engineering detail required by a front facing mass consumer product. Therefore internal tools teams do not require as rigid software engineering rules as mass consumer products.
> Amazon could have easily allocated them to some flashy consumer product, but management decided that it's important to have a team working on HR software.
No, they couldn't. Internal HR tools usually means CRUD applications. Why would you put a SQL developer on a deep learning optimization team?
Don't try to defend Amazon here. They have messed up with the way they treat employees. 30 hour weeks doesn't change that.
And who else besides Jeff Dean, enjoys such a distinguished role?
I probably had you second thinking your comment for a bit. It's actually a star.
You NEED researchers to build a robust autonomous vehicle or speech recognition system. Hell, you know how many electrical and materials scientists they have working on the iPhone?
Physical products actually requires science and research. Designing a responsive landing page does not.
So what are these companies doing? Linear regression in excel? I don't see any of them beating Go players or building self-driving cars.
> Does anyone really care Apple doesn't give away free time / knowledge to people?
End users, no. Engineers and researchers, yes. Who builds the products the end users love? Engineers and researchers.
I don't know, say, the thousands of future engineers and researchers, that, you know, make the product?
And how many classmates were not employed? Far more. So yes, the grad/undergrad distinction is valid. Undergrads are often assigned boring research jobs and are paid less.