Not if some people are choosing to build apps and libraries in assembly. Websites using manually written JavaScript and HTML should be disabled to run on modern browsers.
1,532 karma · joined July 24, 2013
- AppsWorld London
Ha-ha-ha, awesome!
So it's open, but you are not practically allowed to fix inconsistencies due to compatibility (especially outside of turtle-speed committees) and you are also not allowed to do things own way?
No, no. You have to use a document-oriented mark-up to create GUIs and for business logic you have to use/compile to a legacy language flawed from the day one which cannot be fixed!
"Open"? Really?
Android: hate the new GUI and every game prompting me to sign in to stupid G+ or whatever it's called. Anyone tried Cyanogen on Nexus 2013 tablet?
I know it's not your fault but this statement doesn't make any sense. Web is made of hyper-linked content not jQuery animations and AJAX.
E.g. "You don't know what callback hell means. You don't know the horror of refactoring a weakly typed dynamic language. You are truly blessed for you don't know JS."
But they would be programmed to seek self-improvement in order to avoid becoming obsolete."
No, no, no: we are not going to apply evolution, we will simply let the fittest survive!
http://www.keyboardco.com/blog/index.php/2012/12/an-introduc...
PS: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/1140149...
1) build a functional language with lots of features but having a really weird ML-style syntax (because 'succinct' and "you don't need those braces")
2) create a try[lang name].com website
3) ?
4) Profit!
It's interesting that strong static languages have more issues open (top 5) - easier to spot them?