Anyone know if there's a detailed response from NASA to the article?
7,859 karma · joined April 5, 2021
Anyone know if there's a detailed response from NASA to the article?
(Sincere question, not snark)
If people are calling this hypocrisy, then I suspect there's a larger moral argument that hasn't been articulated.
That's not clear. Mines are generally concealed. It's the reason that mine-sweeping is slow and dangerous.
And there's no public information (AFAIK) that let's us rule out mines having been, or even currently being, laid.
Worst. Isekai. Idea. Ever.
But FWIW, my point was about very harsh punishments in general, not specifically the death penalty.
My expression of gratitude was sincere.
TIL that I'm not "familiar" with linear algebra ;)
But seriously, thanks for sharing that knowledge.
Do very harsh punishments significantly reduce future occurrences of the offense in question?
I've heard opponents of the death penalty argue that it's generallynot the case. E.g., because often the criminals aren't reasoning in terms that factor in the death penalty.
On the other hand (and perhaps I'm misinformed), I've heard that some countries with death penalties for drug dealers have genuinely fewer problems with drug addiction. Lower, I assume, than the numbers you'd get from simply executing every user.
So I'm curious where the truth lies.
FWIW, I read this as equating a particular regional accent with stupidity.
I imagine it wasn't intentional, but it's something to consider.
For what it's worth, I think a lot of us Americans have realized that we don't understand the partisan dynamics either.
Many of us are very confused about the ongoing support for Trump. There's clearly a huge chasm in mindsets, and personally I've made little headway in forming a plausible mental model that explains it all.
However, having been unemployed for over a year with a family to feed, I learned a little about what I'd put up with to get a job.
I noticed your account was new, so I thought you might appreciate a likely explanation for why your post was being downvoted.
People will be more likely to engage with your main assertion if you leave out the insults.
I was somewhat horrified to discover that the STL ended up with a special role in the language spec. (IIRC, one of the tie-ins is initializer lists.)
IMHO it's far wiser to leave the standard library as something that isn't needed by the core language, and where users can (at least in principle) provide their own alternative implementation without needing compiler hacks.
I.e., those details are inherent in the definition of "library" in the C/C++ world.
Sincere question: do we have any stats on how (party in office) correlates with (government publications containing lies and/or misleading info)?
It's showing that we need to make some finer distinctions to meaningfully engage with each other on the topic.
It beats the heck out of each side assuming bad-faith.
Could you elaborate for us non-historians?
I'm sure there's a good joke in there involving trans-dimensional vegans, but I'm still on my first cup of coffee.
If that were true, you wouldn't see such a deeply divided America right now.
I work in the public sector, and that isn't remotely my experience.
Could you roughly quantify what faction of public sector workers you believe operate that way, and how you arrived at that belief?
/jk