https://www.saanoadventures.com/saanoadventures-blog/2016/3/...
5,822 karma · joined June 18, 2011
https://www.saanoadventures.com/saanoadventures-blog/2016/3/...
Like I said, it’s queasiness/stigma about hygiene, not a reasoned thought. This is a common sentiment in the US- we like to buy our sex toys new, for another example, even though they’re usually made of materials that lend themselves to cleaning/sterilization.
I got my iPhone back at a giant music festival the old fashioned way- calling it and the do gooder answered.
> but if you are using something before defining it you are going to crash so that's definitely one way of distinguishing it.
Would you clarify? Like that was my point, casually using something where `nil` is a possible assigned value, or maybe the variable hasn't been defined, makes possible the (sadly common) category of bugs where the program does not crash, but proceeds as though the variable was assigned `nil`, but actually the variable was never defined.
In contrast to local variables where the program will crash if you reference the variable but it hasn't been defined.
My comment meant "bare instance variables in Ruby are not great [and we might not want to recommend them as a solution to people complaining about Ruby/Rails quirks]". Do you disagree and actually love the behavior of Ruby instance variables? Or are you simply technically correcting me? (which, again, I appreciate)
It seems like a big deal to me to go from two redundant energy sources to one without discussing the trade offs in resiliency. I agree with OP, that there will be a large of human cost to giving up gas heat without making a corresponding investment in the reliability of the electric grid (which I have never seen mentioned). My impression is that the total cost to the decision to phase out gas has not been crunched.
Pushing it to individuals to be prepared for electric grid failure is pretty bad for carbon and pollution. All those generators (and other emergency backup appliances) manufactured and maintained. I personally prefer having gas and electric, I feel that gives me adequate reliability, so I don't need to own a generator: I have my gas heat (millivolt pilot generator requires no AC power), gas hot water, candles, and flashlights. And I like not owning a generator (or emergency propane heater (aren't these commonly implicated in structure fires? [0]), etc). Plus many people can't afford generators.
[0] https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Data-research-and-too...
> It's that simple there's no authentication at all
In practice it should require ssh key auth, that’s what I’ve always done. But without requiring password. And limited to just being able to create tunnels via the ForceCommand sshd config.
(I’d love to hear what SirTunnel and caddy bring to the table! I think the auto registering of tunnels is certainly less hacky than the approach in the above gist, but on its own that’s not enough for me to care..)
(Incidentally Monterey Market has quite a better mushroom aisle than Berkeley Bowl..)
Pedantic but suggest title rename to say “SF Bay Area” or “inner SF Bay Area”. SF is just a small portion of the coverage area.
For many of us, what we learn in meaningful stretches at companies, is a kind of capital that we leverage to gain access to opportunities that take our career in the direction we want to go.
If I may speculate, perhaps you are overqualified for the jobs you describe. Or, perhaps you love creating new things but not maintaining and augmenting existing things (which is fine, but just like short stints, is a quality that many hiring managers, especially at established companies, view as a negative. You could be an amazing serial startup 0 to 1 person though).
I confronted him and his response was “Well we didn’t collide, what more could you ask for?”