You can get help from third parties, but they take a big chunk of the money and they just make the process a little bit easier.
950 karma · joined January 7, 2010
You can get help from third parties, but they take a big chunk of the money and they just make the process a little bit easier.
I think a lot of people in the audience had just spent 1000$ on a reservation and they needed to rationalise.
This reminds me the first time I used one of those flat CRT, I was so used to the convex curve that the flat one looked concave.
Now you're telling me antique dealers couldn't figure this out before that guy came in? I call bullshit.
You are not as small a minority as you think you are. I talked to a lot of people who never cared about his comics because of the overly simplistic style. Some even see it as some sort of arrogance: "I'm so clever I can draw shit and people still love it." I don't agree, but I can understand why people think that.
He did experiment with different styles at the beginning, clearly he decided he would not waste time on pixels and instead put his efforts where his talent truly is, in the little nerdy things he had to say.
I'd say I'm usually a rational person when those events happen. Yet, every hour that goes by without news from my cousin who works there makes me a little bit more concerned even though I know he and his family are very probably safe.
Edit: Got confused. It's Chrome no longer having updates because of Vista on an old laptop.
Suppose you have a series of 10 pairs of number coming from the universe, lets call them particles. After crunching the numbers you discover they fit perfectly in a linear function y=mx+b. Yep, two constants, one parameter and you can explain all those particles. Obviously, more particles could exist if they fit your curve, and you in fact discover, in time, 15 more of them!
Wow the model works, it predicted a bunch of awesome stuff. You and your peers name it "Standard Model" since it's so good. It's still just a name though.
Now suppose one more particle comes up and it doesn't fit the line at all. Sure you could "extend" the model by converting it to a Laplace polynomial with 24 more coefficient just to accomodate that new particle, but you can't honnestly say it's the same model anymore.
Pretty picture of a New Zeeland countryside? Ad for NZ tourism office.
Pretty picture of a data center chockfull of network equipment and mainframes? Ad for IBM and Cisco.
Microsoft have been doing that since Bing, show a pretty interesting picture with a little icon to know where that picture is from. It just happens that one is from a game.
People are so tired of obnoxious and disgusting ads that they tend to forget why they hate obnoxious and disgusting ads; because they are obnoxious and disgusting. Then they go on an irrational crusade about every picture, awesome viral video, mystery public campaign just because it originates from a corporation.
A random gigantic game that simulates absolutely everything doesn't let you do that.
Take KSP as an example, sure it would be pretty to use that engine, but that's it, it would just be prettier. It would'nt bring anything new. The game is already fun, not because it's realistic, but because it has much simpler orbit mechanics than reality. A model a regular human being can actually wrap his head around.
The most boring and disappointing part of KSP are the contracts. Why? Because they are random. They have no direction and no sensible progression. They don't encourage you to push the limits. They are just an endless generated generic grind.
We assume actual human beings need to press buttons to detect obvious developer errors. I bet if an encrypted communication with any kind of bad (or even just popular default) parameter goes through anything the NSA oversees it gets instantly attacked and put in a bin somewhere with your new software name on it. The machine probably even picks a random name for the exploit once it found one.
By similar application we mean completely injested so that it goes into your digestive system and/or bloodstream and selectively kills "bad" stuff only, even in low concentrations. That's what antibiotics do and that's what's so great about them.
Nobody uses bleach for that. Bleach and alcohol kill everything they touches at high enough concentrations and barely anything if it's too low.
I think the guy who explained it to me was talking about a combination of counting, pattern recognition and other such strategies, hence my confusion.
If you count cards on a small hand shuffled shoe, even with a basic system it is relatively easy for a player to have a fraction of a percent edge. Good players can have a few percent edges.
However, most casinos nowadays use large shoes and frequently (or even constantly) machine shuffle the cards. This effectively almost completely negate card counting.
I know it took a couple of years here before it was better.
I can do that too:
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/taxi-driver-charged-with-indecentl...
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_28107135/denver-police-say...
http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/5257828/cab-driver-charge...
Also they give real bees and other wasps a bad rep. The only time a bee stung me was because I was lying on it, I was more sorry for it than me.