950 karma · joined January 7, 2010
Google wanted to fix the problem and, despite their best intention, became evil in the process. Now instead of racing for a .com name, people are fighting for search terms, bending to the opaque, machine enforced rules of a single entity driven by advertising revenues.
When everybody was confused enough, they did the next logical thing, they peppered the .Net suffix to all their brands, that way they could tell the DoJ it was an integral part of all their products.
They quickly reverted everything when they realized what a cluster fuck they actually created. They kept the stupid name though.
However, the problem with technology is the scale. You can't systematically collect everything a cop sees in a database; with a camera, you can.
All that said, it doesn't prevent me from actually seeking it to get a lucid dream though. So yeah, I agree a technology that helps it would be interesting.
While it is true that our perception differs, we mostly share the same attributes close enough that we can fix standards (except for different cases of color blindness). For instance, we physically perceive blue, yellow, green and red as distinct colors and the rest is a mix of those (magenta being kind of a special case).
What we see as pure blue is actually a precise color point defined by how the eye physically perceive light. Reds, yellow and green are a little bit more fuzzy because they depend a lot on the ratio of red and green cones in our eyes so the brain is taking a little more liberty there.
The major difference between individuals is how precisely they can differentiate two similar colors.
I think the problem with CSS is they tried to qualify way too many colors with subjective terms instead of sticking to a clear and predictable system (either mathematic or designed), even if imperfect.
Spending billions to make a whole country stop working and cast a vote is another one. Should we take all those billions and put them in more pressing issues in exchange for despotism?
Maybe our society tolerates it because it is the only way to play the game with the current rules.
They tried to contact him and failed. Should they wait until they reach him before contacting all other employees? What if he was number 100 on the call list? Do they tell the 99 others to please not say anything for a few days and ask for a media embargo because they couldn't contact Joe?
What if he was on vacation? Should they wait until 100% of employees are not sick/away/in vacation and postpone the announcement a few weeks? (Weeks? I'm being generous here).
A friend even tried to fire a guy for bad performance and high management told him to wait for the next "annual layoff", that it would be easier.
People with SUVs want a smooth and "safe" ride, not to throw themselves down a mountain and conquer nature like in TV ads.
The first year, it was so refreshing, people were smiling and relaxing. Then the next year people started to get pissed as they realised blocking cars from going somewhere would not magically spawn buses and metro stations. The year after they reduced the perimeter, then the schedule, then the perimeter again, to a point where it is now rather pointless.
It is now this day of the year when you might be late at work because they closed a few blocks and put some grass and electric car demonstrations on that street that is almost always pedestrian anyways.
We get spammed with so many fake "DONWLOAD HERE!" buttons that it becomes impossible to see the real one.
Even the article itself hints that comparing the two is kind of stupid: "[...]where there are few pesky pedestrians or federal rules to get in the way." and then immediately proceeds laughing at the general population ignorance because farmers did it first.
I remember when I was a child, my father explained to me that depressing the right pedal makes the car go forward, the left one makes it stop and this round thing makes it turn. "WOW! Easy!" I exclaimed, "I know to drive now!" Yeah right.
Elevators are automated. Subways are automated. Even mother fucking planes can fly and land themselves (with the right equipment). Yup those giant flying monsters containing hundreds of human souls got automated before our cars.
But wait, Google is stupid because it didn't do it first.
EDIT: missing sentence
This is also why I like game programming that much. A big chunk of the codebase is throwaway code that won't be transported to the next project. When the final deadline comes, you don't feel bad making hundreds of hacks everywhere, and it's fun.
For instance, someone playing for the Montreal Canadians will get taxed for about 55%. That's a significant difference compared to any American team where income taxes of 40% is considered high.
Edit: Wow, I grossly underestimated how rich people are taxed.
Is it a random result because of the phase of the obstacle in the run cycle?