Copenjin

For those wondering: https://twitter.com/timnitgebru/status/1276326634195259392

If someone would link this to me, I'll interpret it as extremely dismissing. A declaration of war.

And let's not forget that in most(all?) of the other 1st world countries you are lucky if you make one tenth of that base salary. It's easy to forget. Very easy.

Not saying that it's desirable or that's not horrible, but isn't that the default mode? Or at least that's the world I've lived in, if you are an employee, in the end your opinions don't actually count, you are just a cog. Your position in the hierarchy is what matter.

And that's why at some point you need labor unions (not saying high paid tech workers needs them) and at some other point you start considering stop being an employee.

I understand what you are saying, but I doubt they hired her to be some kind of controller with unlimited enforcing power (as she says: "I understand that the only things that mean anything at Google are levels").

Only highlighting issues without power to enforce anything is not enough to have any tangible results? That's for sure.

But she was not the CEO.

> This happened to me last year. I was in the middle of a potential lawsuit for which Kat Herller and I hired feminist lawyers who threatened to sue Google

Self entitlement or she forgot she was just an employee, and not some sort of independent tribal leader fighting google from the inside.

I wonder why these privileged people (I don't have her huge salary, I don't live in the us or work for a FAANG) keeps forgetting that after all they are just _employees_.

In my experience, most java developers even in this field (or "embedded" that has similar requirements) tend to resist when someone proposes to use "c-like java", too used to their fancy libraries and APIs.

> Maybe it's time to ask security questions during SE interviews instead of algos?

Please no, but I agree that security questions could be a very good addition. But please let's not replace something used as an under par proxy for the ability to program with something likely even worse.

No, they don't. Non-american cars don't even have the hole for the cup (that Ford ones for example have). So, not remotely common, at all.

This guy with his Screeps-Main repo is interesting, he also removed a txt file with some description of what he wanted to do: https://github.com/NihilRex/Screeps-Main/commit/e2c34e211226...

The last things he did were in 2017.

Edit: Nope, same user is on the forum, https://screeps.com/forum/user/nihilrex

Be static my friend.

Thanks, this is going to be perfect for my daily remote stand-ups!

Is this just a wrapper around a subset of system calls? Looking at the code it seems to be, not sure.

Also this one: https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/mini-raspberry-pi-boston-dy...

I don't even need to make videos but this is so polished I'd like to try it out anyway, great work.

There is a lot of very interesting work to be done in this area (amazing books coming out lately from O'Reilly about these topics) but I feel there is still some piece of the puzzle missing. We need more tools/practices for the developers to guide their development and understand how an architecture behave while they are still building it, to drive design decisions (and also check/correct them along the way).

Are we supposed to believe that TikTok cares about the privacy of its users and protects them from any inquiry from the chinese officials, or that is even starting a privacy fight with the CCP?! Laughable, c'mon.

I'm really having a hard time finding the willpower to read articles that just even mention "microservices" in the title after working on such architectures (with Java) for a while.

Nice idea but most of the times horribly implemented, with no care about monitoring and logging as someone has already said.

It requires a degree of attention to details during design and development that few are willing to put in. It's easy to go for a prepackaged solution/framework thinking that you are building something that could be considered state of the art, when instead you end up with something that takes multiple tries to even boot correctly or 10 minutes or so to "stabilize" a garbled mess of inter-dependant components.

Designing these systems require a whole new set of skills that were not required when designing monoliths.

Exactly, have a similar setup, I would recommend against using the approach suggested in the post if you want to be 100% sure of always using the right account.

You just need to find something that fits you definition of fun, I'd try different activities :)

My comment was an invite to monetize, regardless of the motivations he could have, right now.

> Logically, they have the right to do it

Says who? Please let's not start thinking that this kind of silly absurdities are logical or acceptable. What's next, random monitoring to identify wronthink?

Thanks for making the code public, but since it's the first time I see something like this, I don't see why you shouldn't slap a $5 price tag on it on the Appstore :)

Is this accessible only to people affiliated with some research institution as it seems[1]?

[1] https://fastmri.med.nyu.edu/

They say that the performance is similar to n1 and the price is lower, but they are not talking about preemptible price, that's more or less the same for both types.

No.

I hope it's hardware or they would be selling vaporware.

Note at the bottom:

> 1) Pixel 4’s Soli implementation does not include all capabilities and interactions described here

> but that won't stop them from doing it "in real life."

Ban them on online platforms, ostracize them in real life.

It may sound harsh, but it's not, considering all the people you'll save from them.

> by citing that even "fit" people are victims of heart diseases etc.

Yes, but with waaay lower incidence as thousands of studies (0 issues on reproducibility here) show.

> by talking about how we should focus on complete health like mind + body.

Sure, as long as she realizes that the two are interconnected and that at some point you'll have to do something, for real, for the body too.

Also in this case, there is an astronomical amount of research that shows the benefits of being in the "fit zone" irt body composition and of living an active lifestyle.

And for you, my sincere compliments for having turned around your life and changed your lifestyle, you rock.