468 karma · joined January 15, 2016
What happens is, you lift the tailgate a little bit and then the car takes over and opens the tailgate the rest of the way -- far higher than a person would do in a room with low ceilings. I let go of the tailgate and had no real way to stop it from opening itself the rest of the way into the ceiling.
In about a year of ownership, this is the 3rd time I've lost the car for about a week. I probably should have brought it to the shop 3-4 other times, but I let the issues build up.
They've had to replace all sorts of parts on my car, including the entire driver's seat. Even basic stuff like my phone playing audio doesn't work half the time. The driver's side wing mirror quit opening. I've had to reboot the car 10+ times in order for the dashboard display to work. The gull wing door opened into a ceiling and left a scratch. The hood opened into a ceiling and left a scratch. My windows have quit going up three times. Most of the trim / sealing / etc is coming off, misaligned, etc. I probably sit here and think of 10 more problems.
Anyway, I knew I was buying a v 0.1 car and I’m generally happy with it, despite the problems. Their service has actually been amazing, but that's kind of the point of my post:
If the Model 3 has anywhere near the same level of problems as my X, at 10x the scale, Tesla is doomed. How could this possibly be even remotely cost effective on a lower-margin Model 3?
I no longer fight with my significant other about grocery store trips, and the house is always stocked with healthy, delicious food from Whole Foods.
In 3 years, I'm not sure I've ever had a problem with an Instacart delivery, other than them occasionally forgetting items.
edit: I should have mentioned that I'm not very picky about what is actually delivered, I'm just happy to have a bunch of fresh vegetables, fruit, and sparkling water stocked in my house at all times.
Went to MIT
Went to Harvard
Was CTO of a 10 billion dollar company for 5 years, starting the year it was founded
Yeah, I'd take a cofounder like that.
Nevertheless, I will try to be more thoughtful with my comments.
Did you know that women find 80% of men to be unattractive?
https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0...
From the article: "As you can see from the gray line, women rate an incredible 80% of guys as worse-looking than medium. Very harsh."
I wasn't stating that only success matters, just that it is an additional factor and this is motivational.
For a woman, extra career success will not boost her attractiveness in the same way it will for me.
This is a huge incentive. If women don't have the same incentives to work hard as men, how can they achieve the same level of success?
The left is huge.
https://thenextweb.com/insider/2017/02/01/study-immigrant-st...
http://fortune.com/2017/01/30/tech-immigrant-founders/
https://hardavenue.com/immigrant-founders-trump-muslim-ban/
etc
If a women isn't a CEO or engineer, we assume women are unfairly being discriminated against. If a women isn't a low value job, we assume they aren't biologically ideal for it.
I'm not wild about the Trump immigration ban on these countries, but I really, really hope he ends these wars.
Leaving off energy companies, 9 out of the top 16 companies are American.
4.5% of the world's population, ~55% of the world's great companies.
I'm sure at will employment alone wouldn't crush the American economy. But it'd be a hit to it.