285 karma · joined February 7, 2017
Ugh, "awesome life advice". Treating yourself well doesn't necessarily involve buying things. Consumer culture really is quite insidious. No, I don't need some friggin jewelry to be happy or have a happy life. I don't need to buy my partner a $<too_high> diamond ring.
Treat yourself well by investing in what you actually use- a quality bed, quality pillow, quality shoes, quality clothes, quality tools. You don't need many things to be happy, just a few quality ones. The rest is better served as life experiences like traveling, etc.
Free speech is only an unalienable right, in the US, from the government. Not facebook, not google, and certainly not individuals suing a private entity.
Everything else stems from the public and historical landmark court cases related to free speech- and the benches of the supreme court have staunchly defended freedom of speech from the government.
It seems like another example of CoCs being used maliciously to hunt someone out of bias.
You are projecting WAY too much of your own bias and opinion into what was simply a response. It's telling that you're suggesting he needs to have social maturity when the allegations levied against him are pretty unsubstantiated- see the "evidence" of him retweeting an article discussing free speech concerns on college campuses.
Are you genuinely so obtuse as to scorn a man who's attempting to merely respond to being accused of something?
Many people (who don't actually study language or the evolution thereof) jump to a Prescriptivist viewpoint at first. Dictionaries follow actual English usage, not the other way around (Descriptivist).
I can't fault you; in order to teach English a prescriptivist mindset naturally has to be applied. So we teach Standard English's rules.
However, go compare various English style guides and tell me if they are the same.
Dwarves & Octopi are correct, because that's what people use. If octopedes was used instead, it would be correct and it wouldn't have a red squiggly line.
I bought 🇸🇾 and 🇨🇿. Romania was taken already, sadly.
Yes, it is free speech to just be mean to someone. The fact that this man is a leader of anything at all troubles me.
Neural Nets and computers aren't impartial. We should never be putting any power into them to affect real human discourse that NLP cannot possibly hope to accurately parse at this time.
If people use dwarves, then it’s correct to use it regardless of origins.
It’s the same thing with the whole octopus plural thing. Both octopi and octopuses are completely correct despite octopedes technically being the right answer.
Managing farming times and item spikes is part of the strategy. Of course it's not a true RTS, but I think that term is a bit better than MOBA; I'm also biased against Riot.
Some people dislike the MOBA nomenclature because it comes from Riot (maker of League of Legends; a clone of dota). In addition the term is pretty vague. Call of Duty, Starcraft, and DotA could all technically be “MOBAS”.
ARTS describes it a little better but I don’t think that term is great either.
The only people selected were men.
That conference was canceled because it didn’t stand with Github’s stance on diversity, etc.
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14480868
—
Companies actively do the exact opposite because they need/want more diversity. It’s absolutely not like the music world where a large amount of women play instruments... the number of women in CS professionally is low. The number of female CS graduates is and has been low.
Simply stripping info doesn’t mean anything if at the end of the day a diversity agenda has to be met.
Also for mobile styling, there should be some padding / margin on the sides. I have to zoom out to see the whole text and it’s tiny as a result.
The “chilling” effect is really just not publishing private sex tapes (just for views, mind you) and refusing to take them down when ordered to... also not outing gay people. In other words, a bit of common decency.
There is a monumental difference between that and writing a negative article.
The “chilling” effect is not self imploding your news organization by doing stupid things over and over.
I’d gladly take less money and continue to live / set up a business in Chicago.
I have a minor in acoustic recording/physics so I fully understand the lossless desire for some people, but we’re a minority.
My counterpoint: I use Spotify for the super convenient downloading of music. Hit 2 buttons, save + download, bam I got music on my phone.
... with mobile are you actually carrying around high fidelity headphones anyways? I sure don’t, it’s annoying versus small earbuds.
Why would I give up my time + work for free?
Hosting is an easy up sell because it becomes one less thing a client would have to worry about.
Public transit is straight up impossible in many, many areas because few places offer transit that’s actually good enough for never using cars... Good luck reliably getting an Uber in Hicksville, SC or anywhere that’s rural.
I never really got into twitter because of the reasons he listed: way too short messages, echo chambers, and people spouting inane streams of consciousness into the twitter ether.
I don’t see the point of it; I see people with tens of thousands of tweets that don’t mean anything.
—
That said. I think twitter is great for keeping informed on certain events- for me, esports tournaments.
I also think it’s useful for connecting with people and spreading info about what you’re doing- like OSS projects, etc.
Lastly, it's hard to not be on twitter. It's such a huge social behemoth with a vast number of users, arbitrary limitations or not. There isn't really an alternative besides maybe mastodon if it had more people (doubt it; federation isn't easily grasped or shiny).
—
Like anything in life it’s about moderation. If you check HN 14 times a minute that’s bad also.
Analyzing any real language (not Esperanto) is going to be extremely difficult. I would think English is marginally easier than say Korean where everything is based around context, including dropping the subject itself and particles. Otoh, some aspects of Korean are probably easier than English. And all 3 have irregularities despite Sejong the Great purposefully creating Korean Hangul.