3,470 karma · joined August 28, 2015
Essays on technology, philosophy & amateur neuroscience:
www.autodidacts.io
A portfolio of sorts, listing some of my web projects:
www.curiositry.com
@curiositry on GitHub/SourceHut and Twitter.
I address the study referred to by the CNN article you linked in the section[1] on the research on swearing:
"The vocabulary study (Jay and Jay, 2015) indicates that those who can list the most swear words can also list the most non-swear words … but knowing lots of swear words is separate from how much someone uses swear words. The correlation isn’t surprising. Anyone who is well-read is bound to have run across just about every offensive word in common use, and a number of archaic ones besides. The study insinuates that people who know lots of swear words are verbally fluent. But I think what’s actually happening is that you can’t become verbally fluent without learning lots of swear words."
The scientists say swearing is a sign of intelligence, but the science itself doesn’t necessarily.
I also self-administered the CWAT test from that study, just for fun, as described in the Citizen Science Report section.
[1]: https://www.autodidacts.io/swearing-is-dumb/#theresearchonsw...
I had tried using :perldo, and thought it hadn't worked (I was distracted by the "Variable length lookbehind is experimental in regex" warning, and didn’t notice that it had in fact run silently).
However, in this case I expect there to be false positives, and need to run it interactively; perldo it replaces globally without confirmation. Is there any way to get match-highlighting & confirmation with perldo?
I use SysRq to REISUB my machine — but I haven't found the SysRq key on Macbook keyboards; and haven't had the nerve to enable SysRq on friend's computers (which I often end up troubleshooting), since I didn't know much about it, what the security implications are, and whether 1 is an advisable value for kernel.sysrq
Those sysctl options could make a big difference; I've wondered about something like that, but assumed the optimal default was built in. Thank you! I'll try tinkering with those values.
https://github.com/mozilla/DeepSpeech-examples/blob/master/m...
P.S. Thanks for making 1mb.club (of which I am a member)
Now I remember running across that before. I had forgotten about it. The character limit is a bit troublesome, though, and if you have room to paste a link that long, why not just paste the contents?
This is something that really bugged me, when I (belatedly) tested it on mobile. I had to chose between optimizing for mobile, and optimizing for desktop, and I chose the latter.
To have a good experience on mobile, you have to use landscape mode, or reduce your font size. Since it is still readable on mobile, I figured that the people who were interested in the content would know how to — and take the time to — rotate their phone so the images such would display properly.
I switched to shorter hard wrapping, so that phones with wide screens would look OK. But I found that a standard smartphone has so little horizontal screen space that no matter how short I wrapped it, it would overflow (and look just ridiculous on desktop). Also, I couldn't wrap it as much as I wanted to, because of the image I had chosen, which is fixed width.
Admittedly, wrapping on mobile — and fixed-width images in specific — is one biggest issues with this "idea" :)
More about the diaeresis, and why it’s useful, in the New Yorker (one of the few publications that still uses it): http://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/the-curse-of-t...
But maybe success on Reddit / HN / PH could be used as social proof when pitching journalists?
Do you know how the visitors:dollars ratio for less intrusive methods -- such as affiliate links or donation buttons -- compares to the ratio for display ads (~1000:1)?
2. I don’t run ads (at the moment) for both practical and philosophical reasons. (Practical: most of my sites don’t get enough steady traffic to generate much revenue. Philosophical: ads are annoying and I block them, targeted ads invade privacy, and ads are designed to get people to buy things that they (probably) don’t need.
3. I’ve considered affiliate links in that past, but haven’t used them yet: like ads, the benefits don’t yet seem to outweigh the costs. Aside from Amazon, which seems to be the most popular, what affiliate networks would you recommend?
I’d be curious to know more about how it’s built, and where you found the source texts. It it open-source?
It’s simple, useful, and I learned a lot while I was building it. And people use it (which is always a plus).
I’ve used PhpBB (spam magnet), NodeBB (too buggy), and am now on Discourse, which is great but eats server space for breakfast.
Flarum look very cool — I’ll give it a spin as soon as it’s stable.