DelightOne

LLMs sure. My question is whether it is the same in practice for LLMs behind said API. I found no official documentation that we will get exactly the same result as far as I can tell.

And no one here touched how high a multiple the cost is, so I assume its pretty high.

Is there a study or anything that that is guaranteed adding an incomplete assistant: response as the input and the API taking off exactly the same way on the same position?

How do you know it will have the same state of mind? And how much does that cost.

The proposed approach used multiple LLM chains. Then you don't know how much context you need. I imagine it can get expensive. Per Commit.

The open source maintainer gonna pay this?

How do they know its not that the LLM ingested a couple Alice in Wonderland analyses?

Do you know what state of the art for storytelling generation is? Searching for my thesis and not sure whether papers reflect the current state of the art.

OpenAI's API says they support German? Never tried it though.

https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-to-speech

We agree, solving binary search tree problems do not need solving. That's an old problem. Problem is if you need people to choose and adapt algorithms for a specific new problem, copilot will have a hard time and so you will have a hard time if you don't know how the algorithms work and never adapted one. Because copilots are not good at choosing the correct algorithm and adapting it for new problems, as far as my experience with the competitive programming course I took goes anyway.

If you have an old problem, copilot can solve it, true.

The problem starts when its a new problem.

Isn't there an extension somewhere that got popular that clicked every Ad and just did not show it to the user?

Format with this integration: https://github.com/ruiaureliano/X-SwiftFormat

Then make CMD+s the shortcut.

Sounds like an upgraded Plus with privacy, so 30$ for additional privacy compared to Plus.

Why train when they just leave the company in a year for 10%+ more money.

Except that Apple ist the gatekeeper here.

> Having to be remotely operated every 2.5 to 5 miles

Regarding Cruises' suspension, how likely is it that the backup driver restarted the car to drive again after the car stopped with the pedestrian below?

Caching and bidding might be why Google tries to correct users’ searches.

You mean users click more Ads when they are the only sane option besides the worse "normal search results"?

I wouldn't mind an UI fully configurable by AI to fit me exactly. Without having to learn obscure settings, some obscure declarative language or how the UI is implemented.

How do you get cheaper prices when they follow each others' price increases?

Did you try to use something like TCA? You can scope the stuff you need to exactly only re-render what you need. Otherwise re-render the world on ObservableObject etc. Observable only alleviates the scoping-part a little and does not help with re-render the whole body.

Some things still re-render the world and are VERY slow though (ifs/switch inside ForEach with many rows easily brings app to hard lagging, even if doing everything to prevent it -> makes SwiftUI useless for generic row usecases).

How can we trust a cell-originating signal without the cancer being able to spoof it? I think there's no hashing for cells yet.

Pattern detection comparing cancer with non-cancer block responses?

(Trying to wrap my head around this as a noob)

Do you need to chain multiple Terragrunt executions to first bring the Kubernetes cluster up and then the containers, or does Terragrunt fix that?

Its a trademark application, nothing to do with patents the title is wrong.

My point is the effect feel-good, whether it is achieved by avoiding fluff, by (over-)simplifying, by some special content that can only be shown in short form or by feeling more knowledgeable. If you can read more of them, you feel better. I just wondered whether this is the reason few develop the skill - it is mostly not worth the time with no one around usually caring (whether you are superficial or not).

> You can't manage what you can't measure.

How does that make you feel good compared to reading a couple short feel-good or activating short articles?

How do you deal with too much information if not by reducing the attention span anyway? There is no time to focus, no?

That said, the law is not made with super-humans being able to reproduce (slightly transformative) as good as all they read (all worlds' knowledge) in mind. A clarifying law should be created.

How is that possible without becoming an echo chamber? I believe it won't happen without categorization in question/answer/redirect/objection + grouping into opinion-direction per group to curtail baseless attacks and attempts at homogenization to "be right". Everyone can be right in their own way anyway, just formalize it.

How do you make something use substantially less resources without changing a thing?