1,198 karma · joined September 9, 2019
1. There is no such thing as perfect anti-cheat solution with today’s resources. Even client side rootkit based solutions can be overcome.
2. My solution completely eliminates wall hacking at 90% of the cases, same can’t be said for the rootkit anti-cheat solutions.
3. Game can be designed to put corner campers to disadvantage. But honestly no need to think extremely deep about such cases, you would first release the game then check the player complaints about wall hackers. If it is a major issue then you can implement a double ray-cast solution for most reported players, use correct size wall for their ray-casts and ban them statistically. Even if you can ban players accidentally it wouldn’t be a huge portion of your player base.
Whatever type of anti-cheat you want, you can implement it at server-side with today’s hardware capabilities. However, that would increase server requirements and bandwidth considerably, and as companies don’t want to pay for that they install rootkits to people’s computers.
I’m not a huge fan of macOS dock bar but UX wise it isn’t so bad.
1. It creates unnecessary visual clutter in the right and left sides and takes up valuable space.
2. Users will have harder time clicking to start button.
I’m having hard time seeing what is UX benefit of this?
How come as a business owner I never received a dime of those printed out money?
Entire economy is a huge scam just to let richest people live like kings at the expense of billions of humans.
At least bitcoin is a good alternative against institutional corruption going on at the highest levels of the government.
I assumed they wouldn't touch companies less than 100k revenue but if they do, I think I might want to get some patent troll insurance.
Unfortunately it is really hard for game development companies to develop on Linux as most of the software used by artists require Windows to function. Hopefully one day my company will be able ditch Windows completely but it might take another decade.
1. If they can crack the cryptocurrencies then it means that they can easily crack crypto of online banking systems as well, entire world would crash regardless of whichever asset you hold.
2. There are already quantum resistant crypto algorithms, crypto currencies can easily switch to them once it is clear that current crypto algorithms can be cracked. It would mean that people who did transactions between the detection period would probably lose their money but it wouldn’t be the end of crypto currencies.
Most noble thing to do would be using server-side tracking/analytics but because of additional coding and losing access to Facebook analytics, most web sites usually don’t bother.
I think every C++ is bad article can be summarised like this:
1. C++ has lots of features.
2. Let’s nonsensically combine these features to shoot ourselves on the foot.
3. Uh oh, C++ didn’t help us write good code. Hence, C++ sucks.
People have to accept that in real life there is a thing called code-reviews and senior engineers are supposed to prevent such badly written code.
Honestly I also would like to enter to this market but breaking the market share of discord will be very hard indeed.
You can decide which law books you want to read from civil procedure to business law depending on your needs at a later stage but mentioned book is a great start.
If it is truly science, why censor the ideas of others?
I think humanity is making a mistake by thinking there is a huge difference between consciousness of other animals and humans.
An example on hand built entropy generator: https://github.com/nategri/chernobyl_dice
You can do something like this for I guess 1000 dollars but it won’t be useable for real-time systems.
How much time and resources would be spent for above mentioned approach compared to ML approach?
I think due to statistical nature of ML, it is seen as kind of an hammer to every problem that might be solved statistically(which there are lots of them) but it might not be the most effective use of engineering resources.
What is the value proposal here?
I mean don’t get me wrong, I would love blender to be a direct competitor to Houdini but there is a long long way to there.
I feel like huge majority of the people already know that system is rigged but what can they do? Most of them got very limited options against the system.
Government is showing that they don’t care about well being of their citizens by continuously pursuing these type of proposals.
I think people in society should drop the civil contract all together, obviously government has devolved into a tribal state where they do everything in their might to protect a select few, hence people will need to drop their contract with the current one and build a new one.