HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

DidYaWipe

1,345 karma · joined March 25, 2024

submissionscomments
DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
No, it does not. Does the cable company's forcing of you to use DOCSIS-compliant modems control what Web sites you access? No.

Does WebKit direct you to certain sites or block sites based on their content? Does it capture your search terms and curate the results? Does it aggregate content? Does it funnel your viewing to certain sites preferentially? No.

You keep attempting to assert that the viewing tool curates what you view with it. WebKit doesn't. Even if you raise technical points (doesn't support Web MIDI or something), those still don't prevent you from visiting any site you want. Even if a site were totally broken for technical reasons, it doesn't amount to deliberate curation by Apple.

Come on.

DidYaWipe··on Couchers is officially out of beta
But what is it?
DidYaWipe··on AI note takers are flooding Zoom calls as workers opt to skip meetings
"These meetings?" Which ones, exactly?
DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
OK, that's much more informative.

But "non-evergreen" doesn't mean anything.

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
Hahaha, wow, OK. Then we must acknowledge that we're talking about PHONES here, and the applications on it are optional TOYS. The phone could have no app store at all, and still be highly functional and complete. In fact... that's how the iPhone launched. There was no app store for years.

Meanwhile, a game system with no games is not functional at all.

Might want to reconsider your argument here.

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
It "neglects" a universe of equally irrelevant observations.
DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
Ah, that totally qualifies Apple as a gatekeeper to huge swaths of the Internet on par with Google, Amazon, and Meta.

I hope the DOJ adds this to the list of Apple's transgressions, along with green bubbles making Android kiddies feel bad.

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
Whatever that means. Do you have specific complaints about Safari?

FYI:

...fewer sites...

...if Safari were...

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
Oh really? Because this app seems to have good reviews: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/udp-tcp-network-utility/id6569...

So, since UDP is allowed, I'm curious as to what non-HTTP traffic Apple bans apps from using.

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
Yep. We're going right back to "This site works best on Internet Explorer."

Sad to see supposedly technically-knowledgeable people cheerleading for regression.

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
So what? So does every game-console manufacturer. Buy a different one.
DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
Yes you did: "Try shipping a web browser not based on Apple’s browser functionality on iOS. See how free of gatekeeping the internet is."

And no, it isn't. Not supporting certain browser features does not direct traffic or even deny access. So you obviously don't know what gatekeeping is.

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
But you wouldn't. Look at desktop browser share.
DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
How is that gatekeeping? Does Webkit prevent you from visiting certain sites, or funnel you to others?

No.

And the browser-engine ban is being lifted; something that sounded good at first, until you realize that Chrome is already a cancer on the Web that is only held back to the dominance of Safari on mobile. Cheerleading for a total takeover by Chrome isn't smart if you think it through.

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
So what? Controlling how many fart apps are available on its platform does not make Apple a gatekeeper to any part of the Internet. Apple does not funnel Web traffic into its properties.

Think it through: Amazon dominates shopping-search results. It easily swamps any other shopping portal or indie vendor. So it is a de facto gatekeeper to a huge portion of online shopping. You're citing Apple's alleged 58% of phone-platform share as making it a gatekeeper to the Internet? Amazon is actually an Internet-based entity with huge dominance in its field.

Meanwhile Meta (Facebook) IS the Internet for a large (less tech-savvy) portion of the public. Akin to when AOL slapped Internet access onto its platform.

Apple controls its app store. Is it douchey as hell to developers? Yep. Has it antagonized governments and flouted legal rulings? Yep. Has it lied about App Store search? Yep.

But it is not an Internet gatekeeper or a monopoly.

DidYaWipe··on Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
It's really the most interesting thing I read in this screed, the rest of which seemed to be clueless BS like, "changes to App Store policies that will improve the state of the internet."

No. Unlike Google, Meta, and Amazon, Apple is not a gatekeeper to the Internet. They are the gatekeeper to one thing: their own app store. It's tiresome to hear the same anti-"big-tech" hysteria aimed at Apple. They aren't a monopoly, period.

But back to this: "The App Store policies hurt privacy"

No, they don't. The plaintiff bases this admittedly novel whine on the fact that Google and its ilk make money on things other than their software. So by that logic, every company that doesn't conduct business through its app hurts every company that does. Give us a break.

DidYaWipe··on They don't make 'em like that any more: Sony DTC-700 audio DAT player/recorder
"In the the late 80s it wasn’t easy to copy a CD onto DAT, because of the different sampling rates."

At that point nobody worried about using the analog inputs to do the copy. The quality was such a leap from cassette that nobody would quibble about an analog stage. I know because I was one such consumer. I had the Sony TCD-D8 portable.

As usual, the record companies' and Congress's behavior in the DAT case screwed the American public. The lie of "perfect digital copies causing piracy" was gobbled up by a legislature of out-of-touch geezers eager to serve corporate interests, when everyone with a brain knew that all "piracy" was taking place on double-cassette boom boxes in dorm rooms. Statistically nobody copying music gave a shit about quality.

And sure enough, when MP3 came along it further proved the point by being a glaringly IMperfect digital copy. So all the audiophiles, home musicians, and indie bands who would have built the market for DAT got screwed by media conglomerates' lies and Congress for no reason.

And oh yeah, that asinine tax on blank media: I would have then made the argument that by paying it, I paid for a license to copy whatever I wanted.

Anyone old enough might remember that Best Buy and Circuit City advertised "any CD $10.99 or less" at a time when they were typically $16. Then, all of a sudden, that deal disappeared... to the point that employees even feigned ignorance. Why?

It turns out that record companies had colluded and strong-armed retailers into rescinding this pricing. They were later found to have illegally ripped consumers off for $400 million (if I remember correctly), which coincidentally was the exact amount they were whining that Napster cost them. I still have a copy of the $13 settlement check I received from this cartel. But you didn't hear that side of the story much, did you? All you've heard for decades has been the caterwauling about "piracy," but never crimes perpetrated by record companies. <cough>SonyRootKit</cough>

DAT's fate stands testament to the relentless ripping-off of the American consumer, under the cover of absurd lies abetted by corporate stooges masquerading as "our" representatives.

DidYaWipe··on More on Apple's Trust-Eroding 'F1 the Movie' Wallet Ad
It has become increasingly clear that Apple needs a management housecleaning. Their purposeful antagonism of entire geopolitical blocs with anti-developer douchebaggery alone should have resulted in heads rolling.

But Jony Ive was part of the problem. His "taste level" resulted in the embarrassing emoji bar forced on "pro" users, a grossly defective keyboard that crippled Apple computers for five years, a computer with no available ports on it, regressive UI that made products less useful with every revision, battery life so poor that people were crouching in the corners of cafes next to outlets before lunch, the removal of headphone jacks from the best-selling music players... Ive is pompous hack with no ideas for the advancement of products.

Meanwhile, lazy and ignorant pundits have incorrectly lumped Apple into "big tech" with Google, Amazon, and Meta because they can't be bothered to inform themselves (or even think) about the fact that those companies are all gatekeepers to huge swaths of the Internet; Apple is not. And their continual whining about Apple being "behind on AI" further testifies to their laziness and lack of critical thinking.

Nonetheless, Apple has forfeited the high road. They're now another asshole in the club, inviting scrutiny and crackdowns that threaten the value of the company. What are the owners going to do about it?

DidYaWipe··on Copilot Chat in VS Code is now open source
Valid question. There's some area where the text of the setting's state is the opposite of what the checkbox shows. I'll try to dig up a screen shot.

Historically, setting syntax colors has sucked too, but I don't remember the current state of that.

DidYaWipe··on Copilot Chat in VS Code is now open source
Yet the Settings UI is still a nonsensical mess.
DidYaWipe··on Copilot Chat in VS Code is now open source
USED to expect from Microsoft.

Have you even used any of their products lately? Where "lately" = the last 15 years...

DidYaWipe··on A new PNG spec
Yes, worst of all.
DidYaWipe··on A new PNG spec
Image sensors don't "output images in a lossy format" as far as I know.
DidYaWipe··on A new PNG spec
Given that rotation sensors have been standard equipment on most cameras (AKA phones) for many years now, I would expect pixel-reordering to be built into supporting ASICs and to impose negligible performance penalties.
DidYaWipe··on A new PNG spec
At this point I expect any camera ASICs to be able to incorporate this logic for plenty-fast processing. Or to do it when writing out the image file, after acquiring it to a buffer.

Your raw-image idea is interesting. I'm curious as to how photosites' arrangement would play into this.

DidYaWipe··on A new PNG spec
Indeed. Whenever I'm using an image browser/manager application that supports rotating images, I wonder if it's doing JPEG rotation properly (as you describe) or just flipping the dumb flag.
DidYaWipe··on A new PNG spec
"PNG is popular with some Commercial Application developers, but the exposure and color problems still look 1980's awful in some use-cases."

What are you talking about? It's a bitmap. It has nothing to do with "exposure and color problems."

DidYaWipe··on A new PNG spec
For animations with lots of regions of solid color it could do very well.
DidYaWipe··on A new PNG spec
The stupid thing is that any device with an orientation sensor is still writing images the wrong way and then setting a flag, expecting every viewing application to rotate the image.

The camera knows which way it's oriented, so it should just write the pixels out in the correct order. Write the upper-left pixel first. Then the next one. And so on. WTF.

DidYaWipe··on The Tandy Corporation
Who the hell downvotes that? Pathetic.
← PreviousPage 2 of 31Next →