2,094 karma · joined September 12, 2012
While they are completely different things, for many users in many circumstances they are substitutes.
I worked for a startup that got into the rackspace program and had several thousand $/month free in rackspace services. The same amount of raw power on DO would have cost 200$/month, but a couple of 20$/month DO VMs would have been ample.
And for prototyping you usually don't need anything more sophisticated than a VM (or a free heroku account for that matter ...)
Other than that I'd be super interested in your site :)
More people have been killed by lunatics while going to church without churches imposing a security theatre on attendees.
If you expose an service based on AGPL licensed service, you have to make the source code available to the services that use it.
For example you could modify WordPress (which is GPL licensed), put it on your server and let it serve pages without providing your modified source code to anyone.
If WordPress was AGPL licensed you would have to provide your modified source code to anyone using the system.
This also effects services that use libraries that are AGPL licensed (like newer versions of iText), but not services, that use other services.
The point is AGPL only adds that if you consume it over the network, you have the right to the source code. If you use it as a network service, for your webapp, your webapp is the consumer.
MongoDB has the same licensing model, and nobody sued Foursquare for the source code, so I guess this is legally tested ;)
That would be absolutely fine.
It would create a huge incentive for companies to develop at least parts of their software as open source. Think of how much reinventions of the wheel we could avoid if run of the mill components for companies would be in the open.
The IBM case is unrealistic because IBM would still need to make profits for it's shareholders. If IBM was to transform into a huge non for profit that uses consultants' fees to develop open source software (think of open source Watson), That would definitely a net plus for society that would outweigh the loss of double dutch diminished corporate taxes by several orders of magnitude.
In a society in which a hefty part of the male population thinks that buying a woman drinks or even dinner entitles them to have a happy ending, this statement is very cynical.
Au contraire, I think that allowing people to pay for sex might actually de-blur some lines here. If you want quick sex for money go to a prostitute. If you want companionship that at some point get intimate enough to end in sex, date someone. If you buy someone dinner do that because you want to and not with an implicit expectation of getting something in return. Jeez.
What puzzles me immensely is that in progressive countries like Sweden the push against prostitution is almost worse (although with the angle that the buyers are criminalized), and that feminist women don't see that decriminalization would have a mostly empowering fact for the prostitutes (who are mostly female).
I can see that it is an icky subject for many and how people who fight against the objectification of women might fall in the trap of thinking that selling your time for a fee might contribute to that.
However pimping out my brain for trying to make people spend their money on ingame purchases is way ickier to me.
Then using another size as xs let's you define the grid for bigger sreens while on small screens the content is just stacked vertically.
- Where do you plan to place the infrastructure of the cooperative?
- What is your expected timeline to issue Browser accepted certificates?
- Are you planning to provide an API for signing CSRs?
I am currently working on a solution for self hosted messaging and file synchronization, and your project would complement our efforts to give people the possibility to self-host securely.
In my opinion the one great thing the European Union brought to us is to tear down these pesky border stations where people insist on checking your passport and exact medieval tolls on goods that are transported a few miles just because the few miles cross a mostly imagined line.
However borders can be removed by implosion, too. If you assign more and more rights to smaller and smaller units borders will get less and less important.
The Seven Kingdoms of Anglia will probably join the Schengen treaty as they don't have a common big external border to protect.
That way we get all benefits: Decisions are made closer at the people and the number of borders that impede our movements will be reduced.
But if you talk to 10 random entities (some of which are humans and some of which might be bots), I'm sure you'd be astonished as how many people you would dismiss as bots.
The step from HTML only to a slightly enhanced webpage with dynamic elements is easier than with any other language (JS included).
Combine that with the simplicity of mod_apache (that is available on almost every web host) and it is the easiest way into programming.
Create a mod_[ruby|python] that just evaluates ERB/Jinja templates and is as simple to integrate into apache and you might be able to do something good.
But it is easier to switch to Heroku for the IBM customer than to become Heroku for IBM. I wouldn't bet on IBM.
Their deployment process for a business critical java application is as follows:
- Someone calls IBM to alert the person (resource) responsible that they want to do a new deployment. If this person is sick or on vacation, try again later.
- Then they send over a jar file with the compiled application.
- The responsible person copies the jar file to the appropriate location and restarts the server.
I rest my case.
If you are concerned about someone hijacking the gmail session you have lost anyway, as the decrypted (or not-yet-encrypted) text surely has to hit the dom at some point.
We don't know nearly enough about the brain to argue that the removal must restore the previous personality.
Nice proof of concept though.
Without this information I don't bother.