6,140 karma · joined January 21, 2010
This is the most amazing thing about this story. Not only did the company not threaten him, they actually fixed the issues.
I absolutely would do that. Sometimes I already do wait that kind of time for a taxi or bus. Having the robo taxi turn up in ten minutes from when I decided I wanted to go to the shop would be fantastic.
Passive-aggressive minefield. Someone will see a change done to THEIR code, without the changer even asking, and it will feel like the person who did it is a passive aggressive dickhead. Resentment will brew, tempers will be lost. It will only get worse from there. Software engineers already aren't exactly known for their humbleness and ability to swallow their ego.
Definitely. This can work very much to your favour.
There have been times when I have happily shipped a product containing issues and bugs that would be catastrophic for any customer using it, because I know that no customer actually ever will. The product is shipped and released, everyone is happy.
The catastrophic issues won't ever come up because that shipped product will never be used by anyone.
Big people are happy because the product is shipped.
Team are happy because big people have stopped causing so much friction in their desire to ship.
When the measurement becomes "have we slapped the label shipped on it", then that's what you get. A label.
Yet people do, and they find it useful and it helps them solve problems and get results.
Some dickhead flinging racial slurs at me all day doesn't make me feel that they have my back. Quite the opposite, actually.
I'm not asking for us to fire people; I'd like to see the consequence that people are guided and helped to be better at their jobs, and the company stops making the same errors over and over.
We can look at the data. Aactual cities where jaywalking isn't a crime; they do not set the speed limit at 10, and it all seems to work fine.
We already know what can go wrong.
We already did that decades and decades ago. Sugar, for example. Aside from so many foods being laced with it, you can now simply walk into a store and buy a kilogram of sugar and eat it. So many other examples. That ship sailed a long long time ago. All we can do now is nudge the dial the other way.
As for making the healthcare industry blush; the healthcare industry in the US is brutally uncommunist.
Did you really mean communist? If so, in what way is land planning in the US operated under principles of common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange.
Well here's something odd. Just yesterday I was in a city crossing it from one side to the other, and it was so much faster by underground train than it would have been in a car. Yet your statement suggests that that real experience couldn't be true.
Perhaps it's more accurate to say that public transport is SOMETIMES worse than a car. What do you think? Might that be more accurate?
Sounds like you very much do understand.
I understand a lot of people don't and this significantly increases the rate of vehicle collisions and other accidents.
"Software engineers often have an unjustified belief that they are intuitive experts in fields in which they have no training or experience."
Including, very frequently, understanding written text.
Then, once you've done that, recognise that what comes in will not match what you said and you can either have software that doesn't do what the users need and want it to do, or software that accepts input that doesn't quite match requirements.