363 karma · joined January 20, 2016
$35 on Amazon. Worth every penny!
Usenet was deployed in 1980, only a year after the SF-LOVERS email chain started.
Bottle is great if you have a simple use case... but getting HTTPS going was horrible. I can't count how many back-end engines I tried (cherrypi, paste, cheroot, gevent, waitress, etc.). Finally got it working on gunicorn.
I'd love to find a framework that abstracts all this away so I don't have to think about it...
I'm building an app using Bottle as the framework and getting HTTPS to work properly (with a proper certificate) has been a nightmare. I think I fixed it after a full day of research and tinkering yesterday.
This app is super small... maybe 5 users simultaneously, so I don't need the overkill of Django or integrating with something on Apache or Nginx.
REMI looks pretty straightforward and lightweight; even without HTTPS it looks useful... I'll give it a whirl and keep it in my bag of tricks!
When I read it as a student pilot, I found the book to be oddly written, but so applicable. That one sentence will do wonders for final approach and landings!
https://genius.com/Nick-lowe-who-was-that-man-lyrics
Can't find a video on youtube...
About Qubes: I was just playing with it a couple of weeks ago. It's interesting, and I'd consider using it except for one thing. When you're running a browser, the cursor doesn't change when hovering over a link. I know it sounds nitpicky, but I kind of want/need that. I did some digging around and didn't get any solution. Are you OK with that, or did you find a workaround?
In years past you may have spent hours getting wireless or sound working. These days, if you buy decent, mainstream hardware it just works. Ubuntu does a great job of getting out of the way.
I'm a Fedora guy, myself, but find myself recommending Xubuntu to more and more people for casual computing because 1) it really does just work, and 2) Xfce is lightweight and lets you use your CPU for doing real work vs. holding up a bloated windows manager.
I can't imagine (as the author asserts) that people left Windows for Apple because of the lack of a command ssh client. Here's a thought: If you need to spend time on Unix/Linux machines, why not just run that on the desktop? I've been Linux only for 10 years and have no issues. OK, I do need Windows for the rare moments where I have to collaborate on Word or PowerPoint documents; Win in a VM (KVM/QEMU) gets the job done.
Does this new client support ssh-copy-id and passwordless logins? I have a couple of public-facing machines that need ssh; I refuse to enable password authentication as they'll get banged on all day!
I've run it on everything from tiny, Atom-based machines to kitted-out HP DL385s, and even on ESXi virtual machines. It works great in all scenarios.
I'm a huge fan of pfSense which wraps a nice UI and some great tools (proxy, AV, analysis, etc.) into one big package. Worth a look. I used to run my home router on a little Qotom computer, but virtualized it to get rid of wires and boxes; works great. I'm running three pfSense boxes in various environments and can't say enough good things about 'em.
That has to be one of the simplest, reliable, and over-engineered motors MB ever made. I spent 5 years running mine on vegetable oil! I figure that would have been a good Africa motor.
How's getting gas been so far?