-12 karma · joined September 22, 2020
I’ll just keep eating my grass fed beef, thanks.
Now, and in the future, when the press and experts say something one should be very skeptical. Are they simply lying for some hidden purpose which they believe is the greater good? Nobody likes to talk about this, seems the experts and press would rather we all forget.
A couple years ago Apple decided to get rid of all my notes I had made in files in the Get Info tab's notes field. They switched the field to "tags" and simply threw away all the notes in all the resource forks, rather than even converting them to tags. About ten thousand notes, destroyed, no notification this would happen, nothing.
What'd be the point of it all? There are perhaps dozens to hundreds of personal takes on emacs on Github and around the web. emacs will remain as it is, it isn't for some people and that's OK.
What's the function of the X.org maintainers now? Mainly merging drivers. It's been like this for over a decade, heck back in the old days several bold moves were made for network transparent 3D acceleration with X.org including working patches but it was never realized.
With everybody else going their own way, it might be time to revisit and reinvigorate these efforts.
SEO is the cancer that killed the web.
This is the core criticism that's been advanced since a decade ago. X is the standard, it's an actual standard. Wayland is apparently both a protocol which is defined by an XML file, a reference implementation, but yet not a standard. It's going to be tough to get it into deployment until it is standardized and finished, so to speak.
It also doesn't give me any benefits, the programs I use all use X so Wayland becomes a parent process to X and that's apparently its job. Why not just skip it? X is very time worn and honed to a sharp edge, it can run on incredibly minimal hardware. Wayland depends on a lot more.
One great example is wifi, you create one config file in /etc/ for each interface, and then decide how you want it to be handled. To control wifi, you use ifconfig as you would any other interface. Why not just treat it as an additional interface and make it work with all the normal Unix type utilities and workflow?
This is correctness.