4,332 karma · joined May 24, 2012
Software Engineer based in Berlin.
The username is a reference to a mythical snake found in Central Indian Highlands.
Twitter: @samkhawase
email: sam dot khawase @gmail
[my public key: https://keybase.io/samkhawase; my proof: https://keybase.io/samkhawase/sigs/1q1gmkKlBt4bU_c9axiE0VUYIQjAXgLxl_u9Pkd7hBQ ]
I had the same thought when I read this part. The $6MM investment on Agent Mail is in serious trouble right now.
I just installed llama.cpp on CachyOS after reading this article. It’s much faster and better than Ollama.
I am always skeptical of urban people wanting to move back to little villages to do farming. Farming is a back-breaking and a tough job. You are exposed to all the vagaries of nature. The market forces are also not always in your favour. It is another version of "quit-job-and-open-a-coffee-shop" fallacy.
Here’s the announcement from 2013:
I did the same last year and had lots of fun in the process.
Vintage would be my MBP Air from 2011 that also run Arch and XFCE on a 4GiB RAM.
Is that a commonly requested use case for AWS SES users?
I’m building it on Cloudflare Workers with advanced tracking, modern templates, and advanced webhook integration. Developers can also configure and schedule advanced workflows for their specific needs
The users can review their usage and performance using an intuitive dashboard.
Email is a crowded space and this is my first attempt at doing something indie at this scale. Wish me luck!
What do you mean by “Rust for displays”? Bikeshedding?
Shameless plug: I wrote about my experience here
https://samkhawase.com/blog/hacking-kindle/
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43822251
I’m happy with XFCE now and it is very performant.
Great use case for an LLM to make these changes as HN is open source. It’ll also tell us if LLMs can go beyond JS slop.
I want BlueSky to succeed but this sampling bias is simply too much to ignore.
This comment (by nunobrito) from few days ago on a similar topic is best analysis of this topic.
> These news are awfully similar to click-bait stating "the science is settled" by grouping a small set of the group and then pretending it represents the whole. The paper failed both to identify the overall number of scientists using X or the cases where multiple platforms are used (most common scenario). Therefore the paper only seems biased on its best scenario or downright propaganda at its worst. > NOSTR and Mastodon should never be left out of any serious research.