1,826 karma · joined November 20, 2013
If I am dependent on the curator to determine the level of privacy then I've already lost.
Edit for a quick citation for my claim:
https://graphics.reuters.com/ELECTRIC-VEHICLES/EMISSIONS/rlg...
Also the NASA paper was published a year ago, and the article linked in OP was published a few months ago. Is there some development that is causing this to surface again now?
Stripe's threat modeling is nothing like SecureDrop's. Stripe has plenty of identifying information that they would be forced to surrender upon subpoena that SecureDrop simply wouldn't be able to furnish because it never has that information to begin with. How is this not apparent? Comparing the two reeks of bad faith.
Onion services provide authentication and NAT traversal while maintaining security and anonymity. Just because you aren't using that functionality doesn't mean it doesn't have a use.
How do you intend to have a clearnet application that can stand up to the same threat model that SecureDrop does?
I'm also not understanding how enabling Tor routing prevents bot traffic from hitting the site. The traffic gets served over a .onion instead, cool. But how does that prevent the bots?
Edit: Looking at your comment history, maybe that was a mistake.
That remains to be seen. In my view the more vegetarian options and ease of access, the better.
"Bean counters said I couldn't fire a man for being in a wheelchair. Did it anyway. Ramps are expensive."