555 karma · joined June 25, 2011
I'm surprised that this country was allowed to stay in the EBU after such a behavior. Really shocking.
Lebanon was more or less thrown out of the competition for not playing by the rules (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanon_in_the_Eurovision_Song...), so I'm surprised the EBU did not do the same here.
If you file a new bug with Apple, publish it here as well. No more black hole, you can see what others have already posted. You can even see what duplicates are about (if the original bug was also at open radar).
Where it falls short? Basically everywhere else. There is no taste.
If you want our business, create a wiki that puts the content front and center, and remove everything else by default. Then let us add our 3 extension wishes, while still staying minimalist. It's not that difficult.
Unfortunately, it seems that either the chief software architect at Confluence is not up to the task, or that the company values quick crappy changes in favor of good design.
Good luck with your endeavor!
How difficult would it be to have the sliding gestures on the keyboard itself? Keeping my fingers at the same place would make things even faster...
Also, have you tried experimenting with acceleration curves for moving the cursor - i.e. moving the finger slow would yield a 1:1 cursor movement, while moving the finger faster would move the cursor something more like 8 times faster than the finger. With the right acceleration curve, the two-finger gesture could be dropped, and you could be even faster.
I'd love to use this in the editor of my choice. Could you make this open source?
If this incredibly crappy product sells itself, then it's only because there is nothing better. If you don't know what your next company should do - please consider creating a better corporate wiki. Confluence is truly an abomination.
I think the biggest problem is acting. 24fps lays a veneer of "movie look" over all performances. With higher framerates, actors can no longer count on that.
They have to sell it much more, like in a theatre, but with large screen closeups projected on a 20 meter screen.
In a way, it's a new challenge actors never had before. It will be interesting to see whether there are indeed performance differences among the Hobbit actors.
Getting closer to reality is a common thread in the arts. As soon as man had a way to move from one-color cave paintings to using colors, he started to use them.
This is the artistic expression that Peter Jackson is going for.
In one of the video blogs he said: "The result looks like where the screen was, there is now a hole in the wall, and beyond that is reality".
Imagine, instead of looking a film of Bilbo, you're transported right there into Middle-earth and it looks absolutely real. Wouldn't that be great? I'm very much looking forward to that experience.
That "video look" he's mentioning is the absence of 24fps artifacts I'm very glad we get rid of.
He could as well just have written "meh, reality has a video look".
That's stupid advice. Why should I always match my tempo to somebody else?
I'm not going to adapt to your talking speed for the same reason that you're probably not going to try to match mine. I'm not your monkey.
Being bullied is not because you behave wrongly. You're being bullied because they others are assholes.
In the adult realm, there are still people behaving differently. And they're not getting bullied. You know why not? Because there is a state that punishes bullying among adults.
We need only one thing: punish bullying among non-adults. Currently they get a free pass. And every generation a million kids get scarred for life. No more.
If true, this issue is quite overrated, at least on Apple devices.
Also, the complicated things that one sees at first sight are a sign that probably all features, including the ones that I didn't see, are complicated. Which is not what I'm looking for.
No taste. Very little to no taste.
While you do exactly what I need, these are incredibly complicated times. And I want to be sure that you will solve my issues without introducing complicated buttons and concepts I have to learn first. Plus Icons that hurt my eyes. But that's exactly what you provided.
Would be great if you looked into this matter. Cause as of right now, 3 minutes after my visit, I'm still looking for a solution.
Why don't you focus just on the realtime aspect and create a service that allows realtime bitcoin transactions on any website (and inside every app) trough an API, and ask for a smaller percentage (like ~2%, like a credit card company)?
So how can you achieve this low latency? Do you just base your decision "x has paid" on the still unsigned chain? That's quite risky and open for exploits, isn't it?
Also, what do you do if there are orphan blocks in the chain?
(Comment about coindl.com, not the book the article links to.)