4,901 karma · joined September 13, 2020
This story has always reminded me of the story of Prometheus. Both were punished by gods for their gifts to humanity.
Does anyone know if that’s a lot? I don’t know either way. I just have a gut feeling that compared to the number of posts made by bots on any political matter it barely matters.
I wonder if it wouldn’t be more efficient to counter with more bots going in the other direction with likes and posts.
What really is a problem on MacOS is that they stopped shipping kernel syscall symbols. So you can’t trace syscalls anymore in the default setup. I’ve read on some forum that you can download the symbols from some website and it works then, but didn’t bother with it at that point.
Ironically, despite DTrace originally being a Unix tool, I’ve had the most success using it on Windows. On Mac I can’t trace syscalls by default, on FreeBSD for some reason it didn’t notice that processes inside jails were opening files (despite DTrace running on the host)... On Windows on the other hand DTrace works perfectly for me.
Not necessarily. Look at this itinerary e.g.: <https://thesavvybackpacker.com/cheapest-travel-europe-train-...>. With a few exceptions, train was cheaper than the plane, often several times.
And now for what happens when it’s more expensive and inconvenient to be concerned about the environment: <https://www.thelocal.no/20230125/why-cross-country-flights-a...>
> 91% say they want to replace short-distance flights by fast, low-polluting trains in collaboration with neighbouring countries
See how a train being fast was bundled into the question.
Let’s forget about environment for a moment. Going by plane is a lot less convenient, when you can take a train, due to needing to show up a lot earlier at the airport, going through security and all kinds of overhead. So when trains work, i.e. they’re fast, reliable and affordable, nobody needs environmental concerns to use them.
For me to be convinced that someone is taking a train for environmental reasons, the train would need to be more expensive for them than going by plane. Because otherwise everyone likes to see themselves in a good light and say how much their choices are dictated by ethics, when in reality the wallet is often a more potent motivator than environmental concerns. Just like every employer likes to say that they hire and promote based on merit, but then it turns out that on average taller people get hired and promoted more often. And the employers will still believe that they weren’t influenced by that. Just like travellers will overestimate the influence of environmental concerns on their choice of mode of transport. In both cases it’s because people like to see themselves in good light. And same way most of the people who say they’d prefer to buy products produced in fair worker conditions, won’t actually buy the products whose prices reflect that. Declarations are cheap. Particularly feel-good declarations.
To me it just sounds like a marketing spin. Don’t get me wrong: it’s cool that people are choosing a cleaner means of transport, but I doubt this is the reason.
This attempt at spinning it as people being motivated to use trains out of concern for the climate is hilarious. Almost nobody thinks like that. Trains are just a hell of a lot more convenient than alternative modes of transport for long distance trips.
Common Lisp is 39 years old and it’s hipster tech. APL is 57 years old and it’s hipster tech. You can be a hipster at any age. (And it’s not a bad thing.)
And some of them are pretty nice. Life is good.
But naive binary search can also be improved upon by dividing the searched space into 3 subranges instead of 2[2].
[1]: <https://www.pvk.ca/Blog/2012/07/03/binary-search-star-elimin...>
[2]: <https://www.pvk.ca/Blog/2012/07/30/binary-search-is-a-pathol...>
We can do that at best 2/7 days a week. In reality, modern life forces us to dedicate even less time to that.
I've done that many times. The feeling at the end of the day is always unlike any other. Wouldn't swap those experiences for anything else.
> You seem to be framing the search for food as a low-stakes endeavor.
Have you ever picked mushrooms? Do you know how little time it takes to get enough mushrooms for weeks to come? And then how much meat there is in a deer?
I agree that the risk of being murdered is higher. Although I think you overestimate the frequency of encounters. There weren't a lot of people back then on Earth. I also don't think this decreases happiness all that much. The slow senseless willowing away in an office everyday seems like a much less happy existence, even if it's a longer one.
Spend a day endlessly walking (roaming), searching in the forest for berries, mushrooms etc., doing hand-to-hand combat, hunting...
Spend a day in front of a computer.
Which one do you think will end in a feeling of happiness?
atime is the most useless filesystem feature I’ve heard of. But on most Unix-like systems it’s enabled by default and the main thing it does is turn reads into writes, degrading performance. All the while ctime isn’t a standard Unix filesystem feature. And ctime to me always seemed infinitely more useful (and cheaper!) than atime.
</rant>