What about bugs that aren't disclosed?
68 karma · joined September 12, 2008
What about bugs that aren't disclosed?
Wasn't TV a major shift? And yet they did survive.
See "Good Patterns & procedures to prevent CSRF": http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Reviewing_code_for_Cross-Site...
I am asking this because I am in another timezone and I would like to get a snapshot of HN at the right time.
At least, both Reddit and TicketStumbler claimed they didn't know who their main competitor was and they were accepted.
So, "We don't have any" _is_ an acceptable answer.
It was not created by programmers. It was created by web designers (hence its great visual design).
Wordpress was probably the only company that has migrated from Ruby to PHP (when they purchased Gravatar).
Game development can involve all fields of computer science and software engineering, in addition to a considerable amount of Physics, Mathematics, Design, Music and Story Telling. There's nothing more complete and fun than it.
"Calce estimates that he had hacked into perhaps 40 percent of the major universities in the United States, _using attack code that he picked up online_"
and
"_He took denial of service attack code written by_ a hacker named Sinkhole and developed a way to remotely train all of his approximately 200 university networks on the same target simultaneously, he said."
I think some users are confusing Hacker News with Script Kiddies News.
2. Searching in 2008 for: google facebook, the 3rd result is: Google’s Response to Facebook: "Maka-Maka"
If history can teach something, Google's future is doomed. :)
Well, that is the "commotitized the complements" part.
The other part of your argument is that it is/was good enough for most users.
But let me put the question this way: If had it been 3x more expensive than the Mac, would have it been successful?
If not, then there's a clear distinction between a great product and a great price.
Remember the 3 Ps (Price, Product, Promotion)? Product and price are different things, specially in the software market, where the price doesn't necessarily reflect the cost.
So if people would not buy a 3x more expensive Windows, great product it not the motive by which it was successful.
I think the most accurate explanation in this case is not that Windows was a great product, but as another commenter said, that it offered a better value proposition for the money invested - and Microsoft had not the better product value, but the better price proposition, so they won that equation:
MacOS had a product value of 10, and a price of 5, so the value proposition was 2.
Windows had a product value of 5, but a price of 1, so the value proposition was 5, for each dollar invested.
But you are right that they have not stagnated on Coke's marketing, although those Santa Claus commercials have been pretty repetitive.
Better product certainlly have some relevancy, because improving IE (IE7/8) will make it good enough that most people will not need to change, but we will never really know how low IE6's marketshare could go if Microsoft had not improved it - maybe it would still be good enough for most users.
At least, Windows was good enough for most users, even with better alternatives along the history - Next, BeOS, OS/2...
I don't know if Coca-Cola is a monopoly because Pepsi is a close substitute, but they are a leader in market-share in most continents, and if stagnation is what causes the loss of market-share, they would have been gone long ago.
If you want to install this Password Gorilla thing in your MacOS, how do you know if it isn't trojaned? Where is the checksum for you to verify it?
Do you remember that even an security researcher and openbsd developer got his box hacked and his software trojaned? http://tinyurl.com/3owcj7
Remember what your mother said: Don't accept candy from strangers. So I hope you all are checking the source code and compiling it your selves.
Not that checking the source code would be enough. When was the last time you checked the source code from anything you downloaded?
Ok, so you checked the source code to see that there's no backdoor sending your password over the internet, but do you yet remember the debian SSL vulnerability?
Yes, there could be a similar, subtle, but maliciously introduced flaw in cryptographic algorithm used by the password manager. So it's just a matter of an attacker having access to the cloud storage, not that that would be difficult either (remember the hacked Fedora and Redhat servers?), and "deciphering" all of your passwords.