As long as the person doesn't take out loans there's a good chance they can recover with government assistance.
There are a consumer protections around necessities for survival for exactly this reason.
252 karma · joined December 8, 2020
As long as the person doesn't take out loans there's a good chance they can recover with government assistance.
There are a consumer protections around necessities for survival for exactly this reason.
The creditor will take a loss (writeoff/reschedule) or seize collateral.
It's better than having the same issue next month for a larger amount.
Heavy overlap in raw materials and supply chain regardless.
If somebody's mining bitcoin they're clearly not interested in ethics in the first place.
Translations of Chinese books/films/comics are still consistently awful.
You've destroyed other people's "money" at the expense of your own.
They're the world leader in electric cars, for example.
The thrust of the article is that somehow they should change worldwide oil production (which they have little control over) rather than domestic oil use (which they are working on with relative success).
Simply put, the writer is either completely mad or a cynical shill of some sort.
That makes no sense unless they're gamers themselves.
In a pandemic with vast spending deficits, the government is giving out mortgage holidays, 95% mortgage scheme, stamp duty holiday etc.
Financial crime is not the only possible use of cryptocurrencies, but it is the only use case where it is potentially better than dollars.
Step-by-step repeatable transformations where the UI records steps and writes code in the background.
Almost exactly what you're talking about, and comes out-of-the-box in the last few versions.
Is that really a success?
Would you take a job if you were paid in only iTunes vouchers? There would still be a few people, but not the vast and expanding industry that we have at the moment.
Vouchers (or bags of cash) are also much more difficult to convert to fiat without being tracked.
In terms of enforcement - preventing all bank transfers to and from exchanges, embargoes on countries that allow exchanges, threatening to seize crypto on sight, and fines for companies making payments in crypto would be enough to do 99% of the work.
Sure people could send payments off-exchange, but without the liquidity provided by retail investors criminals would struggle to cash out.
Seems to be followed most of the time.
I can't even imaging filtering gaming streams based on the host's sexual preferences or skin tone.