HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

IncludeSecurity

190 karma · joined February 19, 2014

Erik from www.IncludeSecurity.com
submissionscomments
IncludeSecurity··on An Update on Plugin Security
I gotta say, the Figma team's blog has been on fire with quality posts about their sandbox.

They've posted all details about their sandbox implementation, then all the details about this dependency vulnerability that they were on top of, they showed how they reviewed logs for exploitation traces to find there was none, and finally described their strategy for future proactive protection.

Kudos all around!

IncludeSecurity··on Ask HN: Has Google made you pay $15,000 to $75,000 for a security review?
Yes I understand the problem, we've seen it before. I still have ideas that could help you if you'd like to communicate off HN, I'm happy to share.
IncludeSecurity··on Ask HN: Has Google made you pay $15,000 to $75,000 for a security review?
Interesting! I have some ideas for options here if you'd like to chat offline to see if I can help you here hit us up. https://includesecurity.com/#contact

Context: I work in this space and actively work on programs such as these.

IncludeSecurity··on Ask HN: Has Google made you pay $15,000 to $75,000 for a security review?
Agree 100% tptacek. Though I would suggest that opening up vetting to add new firms and the resulting competition would only improve the situation for partners in terms of pricing, scheduling, process, etc.

Obviously we're a competing firm to those, so bias warning :), but I think it's a sound principal that would help the market.

IncludeSecurity··on Ask HN: Has Google made you pay $15,000 to $75,000 for a security review?
Yep this is a common move a lot of companies are doing for their biz partners and customers are requiring these sorts of tests be done before getting final procurement sign-off.
IncludeSecurity··on The Heartbleed Bug
>This sort of argument is becoming something of a fashion statement amongst some security people.

Just the ones who don't understand how good API designs can work well to solve these problems, don't worry not all of us are like that :)

IncludeSecurity··on How I was able to track the location of any Tinder user
Thanks, these are the kind that we find every week. We also get bored of the SQLi/XSS treadmill....it's much more fun to find a parsing error that leads to a crypto vuln that bypasses authentication (hint hint for a future blog post)
IncludeSecurity··on How I was able to track the location of any Tinder user
thnx sigh words
IncludeSecurity··on How I was able to track the location of any Tinder user
sorry I added "which has since been fixed" to the first paragraph. We like to write C and Ruby langs, still getting used to this English lang.
IncludeSecurity··on How I was able to track the location of any Tinder user
Hey Harlan, we think we fixed the FontAwesome problem, it was false advertising...the font was not awesome at all, it broke our whole damn blog.
IncludeSecurity··on A Tinder Flaw Exposed Users' Exact Locations
Hey HN, here's a link to the tech details of the vuln: http://blog.includesecurity.com/2014/02/how-i-was-able-to-tr...

and a video demonstrating the app we made for exploiting this vuln: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E2DwdS_PvQ&t=1m18s

IncludeSecurity··on Ask HN: Is HN user interface ever going to be updated/improved?
Hey HN here is a link to the tech details: http://blog.includesecurity.com/2014/02/how-i-was-able-to-tr...
← PreviousPage 2 of 2