1,420 karma · joined May 19, 2015
This is why F1 specifies fuel capacities and flow rates in kilograms.
EDIT: now that I follow the link I see this information is in the first line. Oh well!
Could they have been making this journey since the land masses in question were significantly closer together?
Could they have originally migrated between closer locations, but as weather warmed post-ice-age they slowly increased the length of migration between "temperate northern hemisphere" and "temperate southern hemisphere" climates?
Could sea level rises post-ice-age have covered over islands that were formerly stopping points, or pushed back shorelines that effectively increased the distance required?
Curious to hear what other ideas folks might have.
Additionally, I have found some posts as far back as 2017 regarding using Guix or Nix on Fedora Atomic Linux or Fedora Container Linux (it seems the Silverblue name is more recent) and the fact that we're still puzzling it out 5 years later without much in the way of documented success does make me question the viability of the idea a bit.
chattr -i /
mkdir -p /gnu/store
chattr +i /
The last command restores the immutable attribute on the root filesystem. I am able to write arbitrary files (e.g. `touch /gnu/store/test`) even with that attribute set, so it isn't inherited by subdirectories (maybe obvious).Now, persistence of the /gnu/store data could be an issue, I'm not sure, but maybe this gets you started?
EDIT: next step is to get Guix installed and then try to update the system, we shall see how it goes
I have only seen GPT-3 used when it takes a prompt and then generates more related text, I didn't realize you could run that process in reverse.
The article you link to: > The only other rule in this game is that you cannot move in and out of stocks. Once you make a purchase, you hold those stocks until the end of the time period.
A0 = 1/(2^0) m^2
A1 = 1/(2^1) m^2
A2 = 1/(2^2) m^2
And so on
(EDIT for formatting and also to observe a sibling post to mine is making the same point)
At this point you're just playing with the definition of crime. I would argue that it is criminal to deprive an innocent person of their freedom, and challenge that your proposed scenario is actually "zero crime".
Secondly, you talk of catching "all of the criminals". In a "zero crime" environment there are no criminals - by definition if there is a criminal, then a crime has been committed at some point.
All that said I agree with your larger point - the cost of freedom is that people are not constrained before the fact from committing crime, and that's a good thing on the whole.
EDIT: I started distrusting my memory here and went hunting, it appears my memory has the escape nesting backwards https://lgfang.github.io/computer/2009/05/08/quit-nested-ssh...