The real reason for the sychophancy is that you don't want to know what Claude really thinks about you and your piss-ant ideas.
14,997 karma · joined May 16, 2012
Instead shows me thousands of “Rev“
As such fair use is whatever the courts say it is.
Never knew about the potential stomach bleeds until I took my mother to the hospital earlier this year. Ironically, she was taking Motrin given to her in the same hospital a week earlier.
NYT has dual class shares. It’s run by the Sulzberger family despite Slim’s stake.
They are rich, but not billionaires.
Half an hour after the push I got an email and text from GitHub that I had exposed credentials. I quickly logged in to my AWS to turn off the service, to see that AWS had suspended that service because the bounce rate on the 80000 emails sent in that 15 minute period was too high. It was crazy just how fast it was exploited.
Ok.
Don’t like porn? Don’t sell it.
“CENSORSHIP! PURITAN NAZIS!”
After getting my eyes opened a little bit, I read SICP and it was mind blowing. I read a little Haskell, wrote a little Clojure and a lot of Scala. And even though the day job now is Java and Python, I’m much better off for having bothered to learn it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catullus_16
I don’t think anyone considered that the Latin syllabus might be a cause for concern.
It’s still a useful word, but it can’t really shoulder the burden of making one argument more rational than the other.
Software guys are doing much, much more than treating LLM's like an improved Stack Overflow. And a lot of them are willing to pay.
My middle school science teacher boiled water in a paper cup.
The classic on the subject.
Something like "attempts to reach CBP for comment were unsuccessful." goes a long way. It's a tell that they don't. The story is too good not to print.
2) the reduction step up multiplication of nth order polynomials (to keep them nth order) is missing (or at least I missed it after a couple of readings.)
Apart from those quibbles, this was really good overall though. I enjoyed it.
Instead of the downcast, chastened look of a junior developer, it responds with a bulleted list of the reasons why it did it that way.
Rather they are deep fundamentals of what your brain can contain, so you perceive them as fundamental to the universe.
If we admit there are all sorts of phenomena which we cannot observe directly, which we ultimately observe through machines we construct -- does your imagination permit that there are possibly thoughts that are literally unthinkable to you? What would an artifact that allows us to contain some shadow or essence of these thoughts look like?