One weakness with passkeys is that a person can't login to an account with just information that they know. I.e. they need a authorised device. Given that devices can be lost, it seems that folks that only own one device should not use Passkeys. Most passkey users should probably have a minimum of three biometric enabled - authorized personal devices if they want to use passkeys. This might be the biggest roadblock to adoption as few have this many personal devices.
Interesting exception is that there have been a number of anecdotal reports of aerobic exercise during Covid recovery being a major contributor to chances of getting long Covid.
Massive income inequality is a root cause driver of a underclass that gets crushed under soaring costs and inability to pay for basics necessities like housing and healthcare.
EVs -> no emissions in transport, 27% of US emissions. EVs drive lower battery cost and capacity needed for renewable energy adoption - 17% of total installed and 60%+ of new power generation capacity. Your skepticism is impeding the single most impactful factor in mitigating climate change.
"Stephen L. Carter is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is a professor of law at Yale University and was a clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. "
Are you suggesting nothing can be done? I'm just advocating for reasonable sustainability. Our current path simply shifts harm to the least fortunate of today.
Mass farming destroyed this ecosystem not cows. We need regulations that enables swift, painful liability for any ecosystem altering industries. CO2, PFAS, BPA, antibiotic resistance, heavy metal contamination, seems like we are barreling towards a uninhabitable hellscape within in our lifetimes.
Could be based on an update to their risk model. Apple and TSMC are relatively closely tied together so having both TSMC and Apple increases risk concentration for example if TSMC butchers a node release Apple will suffer for at least a year or two. Berkshire probably decided they were no longer comfortable with the risk concentration of having both.
Less is more. I'm guessing the % of M2 customers that are upgrading from an M1 is less than 10%. If ~75% (my guess) of target customers for M2 are Intel mac owners, Apple should focus on them first. They can then do more targeted ads w/ relevant stats to win each subgroup in the remaining 25%
Could this be partially explained by longer leases in SV on avg prior to Covid? Meaning that actual utilization of office in SF is much lower, but some tenants were locked in longer contracts which have yet to expire.