659 karma · joined May 31, 2017
Isn't this another form of the Meat Paradox, though? Plants have been shown to have moment to moment awareness of their surroundings, can communicate with each other and will turn away from unfavourable conditions. How can you definitively say that plants don't feel pain?
However I don't think there's a clear line to be drawn. Why do most people object to eating dog or cat while they have no problem with pork? Pigs are about as intelligent as dogs (and can also learn to recognize individual humans).
Extrapolating that line of thought there is also no fundamental difference between eating plants and animals, but most people argue that it's morally wrong to kill animals for meat but ok to eat plants.
Is it acceptable to inflict suffering on other beings to alleviate your own suffering or hunger?
A counterpoint to your 'raising humans for consumption' point which is equally extreme but in the opposite direction. How do you know plants do not feel suffering? After all studies show plants can sense surroundings and communicate with other plants even of other species.
I get why foie gras is problematic, but I don't see the problem in a leg of lamb.
Isn't any sort of negatively biased opinion prejudice, regardless of what it's against be it gender, race, dietary choices, religion or anything else?
It's a crazy amount of money. In 2017 that fund owned 1.38% of the global stocks. I heard at some point they had trouble because they couldn't use the money to build roads or whatever without affecting the global economy.
[0]: https://www.nbim.no/
Killer argument. Why not focus here instead?
I see what you did there
I don't understand the problem here. Isn't science - as in Poppers falsifiability - the only way to legitimize knowledge?
I can't read minds. I need people to tell me what works and what doesn't for them. An employment is a continuous transaction, if the situation changes it is absolutely open to re-negotiation. It's on both the employer, the direct manager and the employee to make sure everybody is happy with the arrangement.
And the two times I did hear about problem before the new contract was signed, I was able to find a solution. In the other case there is not much I can do.
Saying "It's none of your business and you can't force me to answer" send a very different message than "It's going alright. Did you watch the game last night? Pretty cool, huh?"
The right is usually the law-and-order side while the left is the live-and-let-live hippies. :-)
I'm not sure what the hydrogen peroxide method brings to the table compared with UV/ozone (besides a university press release).
[0]: https://www.espwaterproducts.com/ultraviolet-uv-systems/
[1]: https://www.socotec.co.uk/media/faqs/faqs-ozone-water-treatm...
I acknowledge that there is an issue around cheap food being unhealthy food and people being forced to eat chips for lunch for financial reasons, but for anyone in the middle class or above I really don't understand why it's more complicated than 'move more, eat less'.
It's hard. But it's not complicated.
Metabolism is complicated and there are some really nasty and weird metabolic diseases out there, based on some small regulatory feedback loop being broken. Don't fix a working system!
If your weight bothers you, just go for walk or a swim once in a while. Have a salad.