641 karma · joined July 15, 2019
I dont want to be too caught up in the cons. criticism- thanks for bringing it to someone's attention in the first place c:
Seconding Iosevka! It's great font, and I've been meaning to check out the customization available online. (Though o do have a folder of my favorite PC Font Pack fonts, just not for everyday use :p)
I know my way around on Linux, and have learned a lot through having to persevere and work through these sorts of issues, but sometimes it's just.. I have ADHD, and sometimes I wonder if I'm in the wrong for devoting so much time to stubbornly persisting towards computational ideals. I won't give it up right now, but I could see myself having to cut back in the future.
I've recently had a pleasure of assisting my family as they attempt to adopt various Linux distributions. I've seen the discussion around the LTT Challenge YT series. Things don't work out of the box, and even people with substantial experience can hit unyeilding roadblocks. That's just the state of things.
And average folks, they're not using Gentoo. Or Nix, or Guix. But mainstream distros will keep improving their HW support, and ease of use. The more advanced distros will follow their lead, but I do think they're going to follow, and that mainstream distros just aren't there yet. But progress is happening, and it's good for all of us: good for naïve users who need thing to just work, and good for expert users who value their time as much as their software choices.
a. Laptops of the time sport specs that assure me they'd be perfectly capable of proforming the majority of tasks I engage in on my computer, and education especially sets a low bar; I'm sure they could run a terminal, CLI text editor, calculator, interpreters, and Wikipedia like any modern PC (thanks to Wikipedia for staying accessible!). Selfies simply aren't the most important thing.
b. According to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webcam
> The released in 1993 SGI Indy [sic] is the first commercial computer to have a standard video camera
> The first widespread commercial webcam, the black-and-white QuickCam, entered the marketplace in 1994 [ . . . ] $100
> The first widely known laptop with integrated webcam option, at a pricepoint starting at US$ 12,000, was an IBM RS/6000 860 laptop and his ThinkPad 850 sibling, released in 1996.
> Around the turn of the 21st century, computer hardware manufacturers began building webcams directly into laptop and desktop screens, thus eliminating the need to use an external USB or FireWire camera.
So, yes! Idk exactly what OP had, but if laptops of the time were starting to include built in webcams, and could run a 20fps webcast, then they could certainly "take and share selfies and video". Interestingly, 2000 was also the year of the first Presidential Webcast in the US, though I'm pretty sure Clinton didn't stream it from his iBook.
a. Code, once provided, can be broken down and understood at a far easier level than is required for composition;
b. Worst case, try several test cases to both increase comprehension and reduce the chance of 'gottcha's.
Shouldn't be too hard to stick with option 'a' as clear best practice, looking up any operators or syntax that aren't immediately obvious, the advantage being that the AI can use obscure tricks that you aren't initially aware of but you still have the opportunity to review and understand the regex, becoming better over time. It's theoretically auto-generated, but practically computer-assisted.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=egamebook.com....
> Wouldn't it be easier to just not use swap . . . ?
In addition to preferences for hibernation, I'm a firm believer that there's a time and a place for swapping, and that one's system is worse off for lacking that option. I may not push my system's memory limits like I used to, but I certainly have pushed through 16GB, and don't like the idea that there wouldn't be a fallback like ZRAM or swap-space backing up the OOM daemon, which I'd rather didn't kill my processes in all but the most dire of circumstances.
Some amount of swapping will be done by the kernel, even on a 64GB machine with memory to spare, and without the time to do my research tonight, I trust that the kernel delelopers had solid arguments for implementing the behaviors behind that baseline swap usage.
You could make the argument that a swapfile will work just fine, and if you're not going for hibernation that just a few gigs is all you need. Live the flexibility of swap files. I wonder if you could put that behind an encrypted block device within another filesystem, ecryptfs-style.
I've been using a proper swap partition (just a hair larger than RAM, for hibernation) since the late oughts, and, ZRAM aside, am well-and-truely stuck in my ways.