4,852 karma · joined July 18, 2022
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/logandark; my proof: https://keybase.io/logandark/sigs/m6zjqnGMWscZConP_8q5dTxchLtZC37IPnwlaj0mBGo ]
There aren't any devices or phone numbers on my Apple Account that aren't mine, and I have literally no fucking clue who could possibly have my devices or phone numbers linked to their account, given that the devices are my own devices, each purchased in-person at an Apple Store, that I've never even let anybody else hold, let alone link to a different Apple Account, and the phone number is one I've owned for probably close to a decade at this point. I'm at a complete loss.
I definitely use it and recommend it though, it's great.
I wonder if it happened for anything other than master/slave, whitelist/blacklist? Nothing else seems to come to mind.
Imagine if people said airplanes need to stop saying retard because that's offensive! For the record, it means to pull the engines back down to idle before touchdown.
iCloud Mail keeps doing this to me and it's so annoying. They don't give me notifications and I have to keep remembering to check my Junk folder. This happens for every new sender without fail.
I agree that Apple silicon is far better in terms of memory capacity, which is part of why I'm rooting for it. But an SoC like Apple silicon is roughly analogous to a CPU+GPU when it comes to compute, and the GPU side is quite lacking compared to today's "traditional" GPUs, even though the CPU is somewhat industry leading.
Mainly, I'm disappointed with the performance of dense LLMs on Apple silicon compared to Nvidia, due to the large disparity in both memory bandwidth and GPU compute. Apple's latest chips are starting to push into just over a terabyte per second of memory bandwidth, about two-thirds of what the 5090 achieved nearly two years ago now. They are catching up quick and I do hope they pass, but they haven't quite yet.
I also hear that Apple silicon is pretty bad at prefill compared to Nvidia even when memory bandwidth is not an issue, but haven't verified. It would make sense though due to the much greater compute.
Not comparing price or efficiency or value or anything like that. Just the platforms as a whole.
I feel like their GPU architecture is going to need a significant redesign. There are limits to this tile-based mobile architecture.
I want more than "functional"
Also, glad to hear that identity theft has stopped existing, it's about time. Hmm, why are identity fraud alerts still a thing? I'm sure they just haven't gotten around to removing it yet.
Webloc is getting this data for free. And then reselling it, but it's outside the scope of Google then.
A service I use recently introduced mandatory two-step verification. This is good. However, they implemented this by adding the email factor to all accounts. I had much more secure methods configured, but now you can bypass them with email. This is bad. I'm still not sure they understand what a critical security issue this is.
Some multithreaded workloads will use the full logical processor count to pin every core and that can really suck on low-end systems. I think aside from balancing multithreading overhead, this is one of the reasons why some more advanced software (such as 7-Zip) lets you select the number of threads to use for a workload, even if you already know and accept that it'll be expensive until it's completed.
Lots of multithreading things I come across as a developer have a default of something like 4 threads, or only use a certain fraction of logical cores up to a certain maximum, etc. because it's generally more polite not to always pin every core.
I would figure that doing less work generally requires less power, but some developers are crazy and act like they own the whole CPU, generate tons of heat, stress out the cooling system etc. with multithreaded bullshit that did NOT need to be multithreaded.