Melchizedek

No emotionally mature adult would conduct an interview like that, unless forced to. It would be completely unacceptable in any other professional field.

Perhaps with another title like "A man of average attractiveness can only expect to be liked by less than 1% of females on Tinder".

From YouTube, to Paypal, to Patreon, to GoDaddy, to Cloudflare, to Google, to Airbnb, to Discord, to Twitter, etc, etc. It's too much and too quick not to be at least partly organized by some group(s) or entity.

Since men are 69% of the company it looks like they are only slightly overrepresented in leadership roles.

> just 2% of its employees are black, 4% Hispanic, and 35% Asian.

Doesn't this mean that Asians are way overrepresented?

> She told Levin of a white male coworker who suggested she got her job more easily because people would think she was good at math.

The horror! Looking at PISA scores from Asian countries or SAT results, it seems to be absolutely the case that Asians, on average, are "good at math". Honestly, people who work at freaking Google and don't have worse problems than this should count themselves lucky to be part of the 0.1% most privileged individuals in the world and have the decency to keep their spoiled mouths shut.

Wouldn't this make a lot of rap music intolerable to Spotify?

There are many, many others.

They partly are. The USA, for all its faults, is the last bastion of free speech in the world. And I say this as a European.

Men who play (or are) victims on the other hand are generally ridiculed or ignored, so there is no advantage in doing so.

Behind ideas there is usually self interest.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape#Rum...

Women (mostly) who have relationships with superiors in order to advance their careers. Or women who have relationships with superiors because they are attracted to them (often because they are attracted to power/authority/resources) and as a side effect advance their careers.

This is unfair and demoralizing to other employees, gets the wrong people promoted and consequently damages the organization. Yet it seems like this is hardly ever mentioned as a problem.

Perhaps this is more of an issue in Europe where I'm based, while the US tends to be more strict even in this regard?

If they can do that to an employee, what can't they do to you, an anonymous user?

That said, I stick with Firefox for private use. But the trust is gone.

Karl Marx

It's almost as if they partly lack theory of mind, and cannot imagine that somebody else does not know what they know, and consequently give explanations that are only suitable for someone who already knows the material.

Though I suppose one could regard liberalism and its sub-ideologies (feminism, diversity-ism, etc.) as virtual reality games as well, with the real world effect of not having children.

The middle class is the class that feeds the unproductive classes at both the top and the bottom. And the unproductive have formed a political alliance where the bottom votes for the top in exchange for handouts, all paid for by the middle.

The problem for the introverts is that their contributions may go unrecognized because they don't "sell" themselves. This is of course is a problem for the company as well since incentives are skewed -- from actually doing real work that benefits the company to selling your own person inside the organization (which provides zero value to customers).