That all formal diplomatic letters are still sealed with to this very day, without exception.
Maybe it’s just a mental shock that HQ would demand that level of formality for more mundane things?
3,875 karma · joined March 16, 2014
mzuo.ca/about
michaelyzuo@gmail.com
That all formal diplomatic letters are still sealed with to this very day, without exception.
Maybe it’s just a mental shock that HQ would demand that level of formality for more mundane things?
Since there is no current widespread agreement on the current “value” of the human mind, how could anyone in the future conclusively determine it went up, or down?
It seems literally impossible by definition regardless of what happens in the future.
The LAPD doesnt operate in some fantasy legal environment, but in the real world.
From what it sounds like, it’s likely not on any sizable group’s top 10 priority list in LA.
That already implies a huge variation.
Edit: But it still doesn’t “bind” anyone in Brazil in the strict sense. At most, it goes from very loose to extremely loose.
Did you not understand what it means for even the most humble adult to be getting away with dozens of offenses per annum?
It clearly is not binding on the “have-nots” either.
Of course there is selective enforcement of some % of laws on the books, that’s true in every country on Earth.
Probably the entire adult population gets away with hundreds of offenses per annum on average (judging by the total amount on the books).
Even the most law abiding and most humble decile of Brazilian adults probably still get away with dozens of offenses per annum. That nobody cares to enforce at all.
Idk how the prosecution system even functions without credibility.
Some people dont want to pay the extra overhead and cost burden of the manufacturer taking partial liablity. They’re willing to take a risk.
Dead internet theory? Semi-random parroting by real people? Or something else.
As long as it’s credibly offered without too many caveats.
e.g. How is whether the training data from this or that jurisdiction “matter”, or not, even relevant to my comment?
I haven’t even thought of any specific “matter” enough threshold to evaluate that.
I’m talking about training data, and so is the parent.
There are over 190 nations in the UN. Even if we assume a chunk have no credible claim whatsoever, that’s still well over a hundred.
> In previous mouse studies, loss of NANOG disrupted both the epiblast and the yolk sac - a tissue that supports the developing embryo. In this human embryo study, loss of NANOG primarily affected the epiblast, the future body-forming line of cells.
Even if the UN only has a very small amount of legitimacy and credibility… that’s still far far better than literally zero.
Do they just not care about weakening their own societies?
There’s no magical low effort way to avoid regression to the global mean, as the population more than doubles in size.
That takes serious, coordinated, and sustained work across decades to avoid.
And it’s unrealistic to expect them to stay perfectly motionless, they will try to adapt to the changing landscape too.
Even if all constraints were relaxed, the absolute limit might be another halving of fuel consumption. (with trillions of R&D)
And beyond that, there literally can never be jet engines significantly more efficient, until the end of the universe.
This ask doesn’t make sense.
…And then Windows 11 became even worse.
But I hadn’t thought that as anything more than temporary flights of fancy.
I think it’s fair to say most had decent respectability.
Anthropic hired heavily from that pool so it’s astonishing how it turned out.
They used to be a decently credible company with not-too-shady behaviour...
I hope they can actually regain some credibility…
e.g. Nobody puts the flag of Turkiye or Spain, actual NATO allies, on their doors.