50 karma · joined August 31, 2012
But the thing is that thous TOR exit points (just like Proxies) can inject all kinds of JS on the sites they display and while some people run NoScript or similar browser extensions most do not.
And giving out your username/password combinations for scriptkiddies and criminals and allowing them to run any JS on sites you visit does hell of a lot more short term damage than any government surveillance, losing all of your possessions in an identity theft or just getting phony bills is way worse for your average consumer than having their Facebook chat logged.
Tor is a good tool when used properly, but slapping it on to everything isn't what the tool was made for.
Basically I'm asking what's so great about Silvrback over other free alternatives?
Couple things about the sites, you might be - as you said - good with HTML and CSS, but you don't have very good design sense. The pages you've linked don't look visually appealing, at least to me.
Also you say on your page that your websites are "coded to W3C XHTML strict guidelines.", but noelvock.com uses HTML5 doctype (as everything should imo) and wildhives nets almost 30 validation errors.
It's a good start and at least you are putting yourself out there, but these would be the things you'd get burned for from my experience.
Just my two cents.
For example I graduate couple years ago from basic computer science vocational institution where we learned how computer hardware works, how to install a new OS and basics of web developement (PHP & MySQL), but now all of my former class mates contact me for tech help through skype even though they should all be "IT literate", but it was just a degree with for most of them, something to waste couple years on to figure out what they wanted to do.
Now I'm studying a computer science engineering degree and easily 1/3 of my class mates have no idea how to code or even how to use basic HTML and CSS tags and we've been at it for 2 years now, sure they are passing "Java 101", but if you gave them a task to write a piece of software most would just raise their hand in air and state "I can't do that" without even giving it a go and I know this I've been trying to recruit new blood to tech club where we write simple apps for Android phones for fun, experience and credit.
Would I ever pay for Linux distro? Quite possibly, but only if the software capabilities on the platform catches up with the competitors, for one I like playing games on my PC and as it currently stands I get sever performance losses and tons of graphical glitches which is a driver problem and as such not so much a distribution problem.
As for now I will continue running Linux on my laptop and servers, but my desktop will stay Windows for the foreseeable future.
Which started me thinking... What if you would build RPi or similar small device into a router's casing and made it act like a router on the same time. Obviously you'd have to have some way of copying configs over from the old box to the impostor box, but it could be harder to spot since there wouldn't be any extra hardware.
Everyone seems to be all up in Python right now and I don't know why.
And while I'm commenting I might as well add at at this point if I wouldn't touch PHP or Java with a long stick. I can barely sleep at night when I think of all the people who still write Java on browser...
I don't see Glass creepy in anyway, they look kind a goofy, but that's their only bad feature I've seen this far. I'm not saying that Glasses are super useful, but they are in same boat with tablets, they are cool, but not necessary.
I'm sure the "bigger players" like Aalto Univeristy or University of Turku are of higher quality, but I can't judge since I've never attended neither.
I'm also the kind of guy who'd enjoy extracurricular clubs, but sadly out of the few hundred students at our campus total of 3 of us (me included) are interested in club activities and only student body event that gets more than 10 people attending is yearly "drinking cruise".
I can't say for sure that these two things are related, but I have a hunch that since people aren't actually paying for their education most don't take it as seriously and thus people just do the bare minimum they can get away with. Or maybe it's just the general level of education which is so much lower nothing feels "real" at least considering how much I read U.S. based engineering students whine about...
Like you forgot your email address and/or password so you can't recover you skype account via that way?
I guess it was more about trying to bring the story to your average Joe rather than dive in super deep, I get that they have to cover the basics for larger audience.
"But I don't want to be recorded!"; Fine, that's a valid point to make, but 99,9% of cases no one even wants to record you.
"But someone might hack in my Glasses and then record without me knowing"; Again valid concern, but no one wants to hack into your Glasses to see what's happening around you.
I'm not saying we should just ignore security completely, but saying that Glass are just bad for privacy is kind a over kill in my opinion.