NN88

I need a full 13"

...this is getting ridiculous.

its funny how when things go wrong in private companies, how quickly the general public thinks they can weigh in on how someone needs to stay with that entity.

Imagine building something and losing your influence over it to the rest of the world.

I just can't help but think most people already knew this before he revealed it...but then I remember...so many people are just under a rock

I completely agree.

BUT on the same token, would you have been ok with an in-absentia trial, even if just a sham/show-trial?

1. wasn't his son traveling with another targeted individual? 2. i'm iffy on the assassination thing because its not like the US wasn't looking for that guy dead or alive. You act like slapping hand-cuffs on him was plausible. 3. Yemen tried him.

Well there WAS a Saudi guy being questioned.

Thats SoP for the Feds/police after a major event.

Round up the usual suspects and grill them down.

PERSONALLY...I wish people would stop defending Awlaki. The guy was an avowed asshole and it just gets reaffirmed with each passing day.

I wish there was another, less controversial candidate to debate USA's killing of its citizens.

I don't condone the US's actions, but I sure as hell understand the reasoning for doing it.

ALSO, don't forget that he renounced his citizenship and Yemen tried him in-absentia.

I'm kinda amazed that after 12 years, info is not only leaking out, but is still painting a picture of what damn near everyone thought in the first place...

Some people don't like any strain of doubt when they can't accept they might be wrong.

Its pretty much confirmed IMO that the Saudi's probably were behind the whole thing.

Which is odd because they have a serious history of state-backed terrorism and islamic expansion throughout the world.

Thats kinda how things work though. Its pretty amazing that we're a country so fervently attached to the rule of law in some instances. It's kinda amazing actually.

Other nations wouldn't have it so lucky.

I'm sure stuff like this is why Cynthia McKinney just said to hell with it all...

What was uncredible about the information here?

The links are just blatantly obvious at this point.

We've got names. meeting dates. money transfers. travel itineraries. communication logs.

It ALL spell's "HOUSE OF SAUD"

Doubt it in this case.

The Saudi's have a history with this sort of behavior.

Their islamically led ideas of expansion have been around since the 18th century and oil is their vehicle of perpetuating that meme.

The best spies are the ones you don't hear about so...

Why the hell don't they just dump everything?

they're politicizing the very leaking they're doing.

I guess now might be a good time to mention John Marco Allegro's theories on the amanita muscaria and its role influencing major religions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_M._Allegro

when wasnt that true?

Who said the military industrial complex doesn't create anything of benefit? LOL

BBs are cheap and easy to text on.

Holy Hyperbole!

so what should I use?

Doesn't mean we can't start looking for alternatives...

Well you really can't blame them. They literally don't know what they're talking about.

If I have 5 items, there are 4 spaces between them.

If I add a 6th item, then there are...5 spaces between them.

They'll always move the goal posts because they don't understand the mechanism you're trying to explain.

While this article did a great job extolling Andy Chan it did nothing to answer the question, How to Get a Job With a Philosophy Degree.

>How can you feel it when you think it makes perfect sense to put your socks on the floor after you’re done with them, and she has this crazy idea that they need to go in the laundry basket?

Yeah thats not going to get you very far.

Basically Uber-driverless cars?

> Based on what he saw, after long introspection, he applied for conscientious objector status. He felt he was sent around the world not to protect his country's freedom or safety, but government and corporate interests.

Isn't that the basis of ALL war?

Greenwald flubbing certain little details about Miranda's involvement rubs me the wrong way.

1. His spouse was a courier.

2. Greenwald and Poitras MADE IT KNOWN he was a courier and often said that they were using Miranda as a way to prevent themselves from being caught with information on their bodies.

3. The Guardian was paying for his flights...and who knows what else. (Can't fully trust them since it took them damn near 2 months to reveal the GCHQ came to pay them a visit)

4. If you travel with stuff stolen from the government...shit gets real...really fast.

Why lie or omit information Glenn? The situation is bad enough. Stop trying to paint this as some sort of "journalistic transgression" when in fact Miranda (and Glennd and Poitras) should have known to not fly through one of the busiest airports in Europe AND one of the nations actively trying to stifle that information.

Considering the SHEER LEVEL OF PROTECTION Poitras admits to using... (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/magazine/laura-poitras-sno...) ...there is NO reason why they allow this to sloppily happen.

Either Miranda was meant to get caught...or they're just being lazy.

Your point might even include the rise of the Dark Web...

Is that...TOR?