Nicksil

>237 TB for free?

What are you talking about?

>Burke said he paid Google “a lot of money for a long time” for an “unlimited” cloud storage account.

>as if the payments for data storage in the past would entitle him to store the data indefinitely into the future as well.

Why do you think he thought this?

>The 'victim' here clearly knows they are taking advantage of a situation.

Why do you think this?

>the individual clearly knew they were taking advantage of a system

Why do you think this?

>Title is straight up lies.

Enlighten us

>"a lot of money" and "a long time" are subjective.

You've missed the point. It's the fact that this guy did pay for the services.

>If he were paying for the consumed storage as a standard Drive customer, this wouldn’t be happening.

>Burke said he paid Google “a lot of money for a long time”

>I guess it’s no surprise many of these parasites are taking their ideology to retail. Millions of dollars of goods are stolen yearly, and this is why we can’t have nice things. Why pay when you can take for free?

lol, what a silly comment. We have plenty of nice things.

>why is it that somehow, the CEO is expected to be an expert in everything that the company outputs?

Who's expecting the CEO to be an expert?

>Is fluoride in drinking water toxic? I thought they added it on purpose to help our teeth or something

No, not toxic; you are correct.

The guy's upset about the school not silencing student groups voicing their opposition of Israel. Seems like the school is better off without him.

>Why is it confusing that people talk about racism, when it flies free at the fair?

I don't understand your argument. I didn't mention anything concerning talking about racism; it was their racist comments I was referring to.

What's going on with your blatantly racist comments throughout this thread? Are you trying to be a jerk and/or get banned or is this your usual behavior? It doesn't seem to be which makes me curious to learn what has provoked this diatribe.

A really slow news day it seems.

I can't tell if some of those comments are serious or not...

I agree with the Firefox folks here: the browser is the user's agent. Being the web developer's canvas comes after.

Perhaps due to the merging of threads moderators do for various reasons?

Build an 8-bit computer from scratch: https://eater.net/8bit

>Unless I'm blind, the article doesn't contain any actual evidence of telemetry being sent – just a list of domains contacted, and speculation on what their purpose might be.

>

>I don't doubt that Windows collects and transmits telemetry data (hell, text editors do that nowadays), but if an analysis of that exists, it is not in this article.

Crikey mate; second paragraph, first sentence.

You still work for Google?

What was your concern with .dev?

This is very simple: Present a one-time prompt asking to opt-in.

Explain to me how my admittedly naive solution fails to deliver for all consenting parties.

>DDG uses Bing under the hood

Bing is just one of many sources DuckDuckGo utilizes

https://help.duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/so...

481.43 Mbps / 23.64 Mbps @ $99.99/mo

Spectrum

:/

>You should also take in consideration, that nuclear waste is dangerous over a very long period of time. So a couple hundred now might turn into millions until the waste is no longer dangerous.

Take into consideration the burning of fossil fuels over a very long period of time. Billions.

>I'm not saying nuclear is worse than fossil fuels, just that we don't know the future impact of waste with such a long half-life.

No, we've got a pretty good idea.

>So I don't think it's demonstrably cleaner "in every way".

It is, objectively.

Indeed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_nuclear_waste_warnin...

>Actually not every way though.. nuclear waste has to go somewhere.

I don't understand your argument; of course waste must go somewhere. Nuclear power, with its waste, is still cleaner than fossil fuels in every way.

>just means they can't write reviews

So, restricted.