NicoleJO

Humans aren't machines, so it won't affect education at all. This argument is a distraction.

I suggest reading the actual complaint. Your interpretation is wrong.

The "fine" is 9 billion dollars.

This is so irrelevant it's annoying. None of those other companies sell the data after stripping the copyrights. Stop comparing them.

Thanks. It contains copyrighted material and is therefore illegal to use.

What is the copyright status of these models?

What are you going to do about all the copyrighted material?

It's not legal to reproduce copyrighted content. Idgaf where you live.

The demographic is criminal??

This is false. In fact, I filed the first BBB complaint.

This is false.

Several people, including myself, have been fighting AI IP theft for years. I filed the first BBB complaint, in fact...

Flag it

Really wish you would since the damn thing plagiarizes! https://justoutsourcing.blogspot.com/2022/03/gpts-plagiarism...

GPT plagiarizes.

https://justoutsourcing.blogspot.com/2022/03/gpts-plagiarism...

Don't share these examples on Twitter because I will follow each one up with a plagiarism warning!

GPT is filled with data that wasn't paid for. It infringes copyright, and by using it, you and all your users will infringe copyrights too.

Your CLI should come with a warning.

https://justoutsourcing.blogspot.com/2022/03/gpts-plagiarism...

StableDiffusion has attracted the Feds: https://eshoo.house.gov/media/press-releases/eshoo-urges-nsa...

What's the copyright status of the dataset you're using?

Promoting these apps is the same thing as promoting software cracks

Why are you doing it?

Microsft windows store does the same thing, but worse.

Check out the developer panel to see for yourself.

Windows store downloads are accompanied by mouse trackers, keyloggers, and more.

You're wrong. See exposed code. https://justoutsourcing.blogspot.com/2022/03/gpts-plagiarism...

A couple of questions here asked about the intellectual property rights. Has an answer been provided?

That's incorrect. CoPilot steals verbatim. Examples: https://justoutsourcing.blogspot.com/2022/03/gpts-plagiarism...

That's a pretty verbose way of saying we want to corner the market.

Those who want to insist there are no instances of infringement or evidence thereof should take a look at this link first.

It's face-saving.

https://justoutsourcing.blogspot.com/2022/03/gpts-plagiarism...

Fair use doesn't apply here.

None of this stuff is being used as fair use (criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, research, etc.) nor is it used verbatim -- a fair use requirement.

I really don't know why people bother bringing it up other than to create an uninformed distraction.

Readme1st: What’s Really Behind Those AI Art Images?

https://newsletters.theatlantic.com/galaxy-brain/6317de90bcb...

Copyright owners have the right to control when, where, how and by whom their content may be used. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/106

Computers aren't people, so thinking they "learn" the same way or for the same reason is childish. In addition, only one of those things is capable of and held accountable for following the law.

It's the law that matters here.