665 karma · joined March 28, 2007
It doesn't matter if your POS is built on open source technology if someone has the ability to install new software onto it.
i.e. UltraSecureAwesomeClosedSourceOS is just as vulnerable to having new (rogue) software installed onto the device as any other OS. The hardware or firmware should have controls in place to prevent this or make it extremely difficult, regardless of what is running on top.
The value of which Mr. Adams speaks is economic -- i.e. what is exchanged for the content:
> And so, as our ability to search for media content improves, the economic value of that content will approach zero.
Yes, and by the pound is how bulk MJ is bought and sold at a wholesale level.
> Doesn't seem to explain why a good dinner table wine can be upwards of $100 a bottle.
This has been post-processed, aged, and blended by masters whose work is more art than science. I'm not sure there is a good analogue in MJ world except perhaps hashish or hash oil. Hashish is relatively easy to produce and may be aged. It is certainly refined to a greater potency than bulk MJ.
So it will cost more per weight unit than bulk MJ.
Their 'stacked' view of threaded comments makes a lot of sense to me. It might be really nice for a code editor too -- the minimal indent width can be smaller, and context is clearer.
I can see the enterprise use case for all of those except perhaps the last. I doubt 98% of enterprises rely on Photoshop.
What is the enterprise use case for Flash again?
Well, yes. Scientists around the world agree that every scientific topic should be debunked. The ones that are left -- the ones that survive an attempt at debunking -- should be taken as fact, presumably until they are debunked and replaced with something more valid.
> If you asked someone at the Harvard divinity school what the most compelling arguments in favor of religion were today, they'd probably talk about Thor ... -- not at all
Sure, because choosing what to believe in, without a scientific basis, is essentially fashion. And believe me -- Thor is _way_ out of fashion.
Malodorousness, perhaps?
Matryoshka is, however, pronounced more-or-less like "ma-TROYSH-ka".
Well, so says my US-ian ear.
> They are establishing Adobe's track record of keeping current on underlying platform enhancements.
None of that refutes whether or not Apple considers using the Cocoa API exclusively as a norm. I think it's quite clear that they do. Are you really suggesting otherwise?
> Adobe has been painfully slow to adopt enhancements to Apple’s platforms. For example, although Mac OS X has been shipping for almost 10 years now, Adobe just adopted it fully (Cocoa) two weeks ago
I was thinking specifically of the Cocoa norm -- which iTunes apparently does not meet -- I should have made that more clear.
How much more open is H.264 than SWF and FLV, anyway?
> Adobe’s Flash products are 100% proprietary. They are only available from Adobe
Assuming Jobs is not declaring an obvious tautology, he is omitting FOSS efforts such as Gnash and Swfdec.
I see a normative claim:
Software systems should do X, Y, and Z
Software systems that do not meet the norm are penalized or disallowed by Apple's platform(s). However, Apple's own software does not meet this norm either, even on Apple's own platform.It sure seems like hypocrisy to me, even if it is defensible.
Is anyone really doing that? I see Trophy Kids (btw, new term for me, and I am one, I suppose) as a characterization rather than blame. There is no doubt the term is pejorative, but if I think canned green beans taste like crap, am I blaming the beans, the can, the producer, or am I not placing any blame at all?
FWIW, I do agree that parents are largely responsible for their children's behavior.
Assuming we are segmenting the Mac market from the PC market, it is much better to be in the PC market whether you are consumer or a producer. For manufacturers, it sucks to be in Apple's market if you are not Apple (PsyStar?). For consumers, they get a wider selection of products at lower price points, though they do not get the design cachet.
To make a belabored car analogy, would you rather be in the market for Italian supercars or that of the rest of the world? Both producers and consumers tend to choose the latter.
From http://kerneltrap.org/node/14148 (which discusses relatime, a less-drastic version of noatime that keeps mutt working)
> Ingo Molnar stressed the significance of fixing this performance issue, "I cannot over-emphasize how much of a deal it is in practice. Atime updates are by far the biggest IO performance deficiency that Linux has today. Getting rid of atime updates would give us more everyday Linux performance than all the pagecache speedups of the past 10 years, _combined_."
> "It's also perhaps the most stupid Unix design idea of all times. Unix is really nice and well done, but think about this a bit: 'For every file that is read from the disk, lets do a ... write to the disk! And, for every file that is already cached and which we read from the cache ... do a write to the disk!'"
You should use the unsubsidized cost. Like if you need to replace an iPhone or buying a Nexus One. More like $600.