896 karma · joined July 5, 2017
I think that's exactly what's happening.
The Market has identified a more costly and less universally appreciated method, and is trying to eliminate it. The Market knows better. The Market knows that the lowest common denominator should be served at the expense of everything else.
And thus the Market eats another bit of joy, sacrificed at the altar of greater efficiency, of more money, at the altar of Moloch.
> "source code free to see and to modify (and redistribute, if applicable)"
You have to see the humor in putting both of these in the same comment, right? That's a prime example of what they're talking about!
At a previous place of work I worked with a monolith structure, and it was actually perfectly fine. Development got done separately on several large substructures in the monolith, and devs could install the whole project locally and run it just fine.
I'm really wondering why we're all using microservice architecture if we're all convinced that to actually develop on them, devs need to reproduce 50odd of those services locally for debugging. Then what was the point?
Was it hard to achieve buy in from all parties? I'd guess that would be the hardest part, to get everyone to join in on working on the automation.
It's a more standard setup, and enables better logging and later changes.
This uses regex to match files ending in .wav or .draft (which is what I interpreted you to want). Xargs then processes the file. You could use flags to have xargs pass the file names in a specific place in the command, which can even be a one liner shell call or some script.
So the "find <regex> - xarg <command>" pattern is almost fully generally applicable to any problem where you want to execute a oneliner on a number of files with regular names. (I think gnu find has no extended regex, which is just as well- thats not a "regular expression" at that point)
For full transparency I use the noise cancelling headphones same as you, I think it's very logical and it does help me in the same way. I don't think that would be a reasonable thing to say to you. But the framing and emotionally loaded tone comes across as comparable to your original comment.
E: and just in case: You will think those are very different scenarios, and your preference makes sense given the context. That's a valid perspective! But the people you were talking about in your original comment feel the same way!
Don't you think someone could say to you that those headphones are expensive and unneccesary, and that this problem simply reflects your lack of work focus? Wouldn't that be offputting and annoying if someone were to say that to you?
But we actually can't! We can build a program that can build a program that is the LLM, which is not the same! I'd argue that you're right insofar as training is concerned. We understand training very well. But the actual model, how it operates, what it actually knows, we don't know how to build that, we don't know what weights to put where.
By the way, I think referring to the burden of proof in discussions like this is likely never to improve the debate. All sides will simply claim the burden is on others for one reason or another, most of those reasons will be flawed- requiring discussions on those flaws and now we're even further from the actual points we want to discuss. I've just never seen it produce a fruitful discussion.
That partial data is very likely to regress to the mean over the rest of the month- though it's good to see high linux usage (on whatever metric this is tracking).
I'd also like to know some more details. Is this akin to archive.org, or more akin to archive.today? Those have different use cases. I'd like more information than is present in the FAQ, for example, will this archive block users of cloudflare DNS?
I'd love to use an archive like archive.today, which is more dependable and less idiosyncratic in what users it allows, so this looks promising.
Taleb suggested that if something non-perishable has survived for a long time its expected remaining survival is just as long, for example if a book has been in print for 40 years it is expected that it wil remain in print for another 40 years.
The point is that projects, books, and other non perishables don't have a life expectancy like biological organisms, they're actually more likely to live on if they've endured a long time.
Where do they get stored, locally? and what kind of snapshot is it, are they screenshots or saved html pages?
I'd like to reinforce your point by disagreeing on two counts: programming (in so far as it's related to computer science) is like music and math in that there is loads of underlying natural order that can be independently derived (think about the lambda calculus vs Turing machines which are proven to be identical, for one example). That underlying beauty is there, and I think it's there because computer science is a part of (or at the very least akin to) mathematics.
Secondly, both math and music are, like programming, not really that devoid from arbitrary rules nerdy white guys came up with 30(0)+ years ago. When you're tuning an instrument, you'll likely tune it to the western chromatic scale- but that's just a convention, there are more scales! Just as much of a convention is to tune that scale to concert pitch, where A is tuned to 440 Hz. But that's not required- concerts will tune to 422.5 Hz when playing Handel.
There are all kinds of conventions all around us which are invisible because we're accepting them as a given of the world, more so if we have a traditional education in that field. That's why it's enjoyable to see stuff like this, what intel-VISA called self-directed exploration, it deepens your understanding and is just fun!
>the only thing I pirate is the occasional movie I want to watch that isn’t on Hulu, Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max or Amazon Prime Video.
You maintain 5 subscriptions and still have to pirate every now and again? I just watch whatever I want on plex+radarr/sonarr. That sounds exhausting.
I don't think I'll want to follow in your footsteps. Maybe I'll take out subscriptions for the things I really like, but I'm probably going to keep using pirated content for my actual consumption - its just a better experience at this point.
For that matter, would you use "sect" in english and be confident it would not be seen as pejorative term? I feel it's all context dependent.
I also don't think looking through google translate with a single phrase is the right method to figure this out- for one thing I've heard the european languages are usually heavily based on legislature (eu legislature is published in all eu languages, so an excellent source of translations). In my experience google translate can be stilted and formal, so which implications and connotations a phrase or term has in different languages can definitely be literally "lost in translation".
https://www.science.org/content/page/science-information-aut...
Maybe something like "unknown length tuple"? chatgpt suggested "arbitrary-length" or "undetermined-length" as synonyms, that could be a more easily understood expression perhaps.
The former is of course not possible with tuples being immutable, which is why they're talking about lists.
For example, in your own words, what is the main difference between typescript and javascript?
In my experience not many drivers cruise at speeds of 100 mph (160 kmph). The richtgeschwindigkeit is much more common.
I was trying to find some half-remembered meme images to share with a friend, and I couldn't find it in ddg. appending "!g" and... first 10 results are correct. It's remarkable how good google is when searching for things that are popular, and how far it's fallen for non-popular specific technical queries.