The fingerprint on the yubikey is really just a possession check for the yubikey in case it was stolen. The main protection comes from the asymmetric cryptography inside the yubikey.
311 karma · joined October 9, 2019
The fingerprint on the yubikey is really just a possession check for the yubikey in case it was stolen. The main protection comes from the asymmetric cryptography inside the yubikey.
My USB-A yubikey has proven durable so far, but it only requires a very light touch to activate.
"Although the material and equipment costs are similar (within 10%) for projects in the United States and in Europe, labor costs are substantially higher in the United States as outlined above. For example, in California the average billing labor rates for qualified tunnel workers is about $70/hr and the average New York labor rate of qualified tunnel workers is at over $100/hr, whereas in Germany (one of the high labor rates countries in Europe) the comparable labor rate is about $30/hr."
That is not what the report in that article says[1]. In Table IV, for a conventional cotton bag, it has to be re-used 52 times in order to equal the LDPE plastic bag in the climate change metric.
For a woven PP bag (which is the most common plastic re-usable bag in my experience), the numbers it has to be re-used is only 5.
[1] https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2018/02/978-87-93614-...
That said I fully agree with the larger point. We have to be willing to weigh and accept tradeoffs.
So if the poor get back more than they put in, how can they be disproportionately be funding it?
A carbon tax+UBi is not regressive, if the rich pay in more than they get out and the poor get back more than they put in. That is the red herring.
The break even point should occur somewhere in the upper middle class. If it was just a tax by it self you would be right. But the effective tax discount through the UBI makes it progressive.
Jeff Bezos consumes and releases way more carbon than the average person. Private jets, multiple mansions, a fleet or cars, a private rocket company. He would pay way more into a VAT and carbon tax than a median American. If the UBI is large enough to notice, Jeff Bezos would definitely be affected by the means to fund it.
Meanwhile a person living near the poverty line would get more back than they had to pay in increased prices. On top of the net transfer, they now have a guaranteed safety net without means testing, application procedures, and waiting times that they would still get even if they have to quit a job due to a crappy boss. They can also move cities/states without the fear of loosing their benefits.
"Carbon taxes unquestionably fall hardest on the poor, as do consumption taxes generally."
Yes, but rich people consume and release carbon at a much higher rate than poor people. As a result, rich people would pay into consumption taxes/carbon taxes much more than they would get back in a flat cash payment funded by such means.
The only other one I've seen is a MMORPG doing free DLC: https://www.polygon.com/2020/3/20/21188141/lord-of-the-rings...
[1] https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/reports-statements/gold-repo...
The funny thing is looking back at Apollo documents from the 60s is that many of those were in SI, but for Shuttle they appeared to have switched the launch and land portion fully to English.
The original comment assumed 10,000 miles a year, which is on the light end.
- Bitwarden (password manager)
- Dropbox
- Gitlab
- Github
- Nextcloud
If you are just considering a companies bottom line, obviously they are just going to do what would make them the most money.
edit: spelling
I like the Tetris analogy because that game has a type of debt that anyone who has played it can understand, yet is not as easily quantifiable as financial debt.
Most people under the poverty line do not receive over $1k in means tested benefits.
Also, millions of Americans living in poverty receive no benefits at all.[1]
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/13-million-p...
https://www.anandtech.com/show/12645/the-corsair-ax1600i-psu...
https://chargedevs.com/features/opinion-sic-vs-gan-semicondu...
A significant part of the volume in a ballistic rocket is oxidizer which a jet does not need to carry. Liquid methane is much less dense than jet fuel, so it makes sense it would take up much more volume. Also, methane has less carbon in it than jet fuel on a per energy basis.
Still suspect you are right.
- VAT is applied to business to business transactions. Sales taxes are just applied to consumer transactions.
- Sales taxes are applied to total amount of sales. The amount of VAT that the user pays is on the cost of the product, less any of the costs of materials used in the product that have already been taxed.
- Since value is not generally created in a second hand sale. (Unless the item is restored) VATs are usually not applied to used/second hand items. Sales taxes are.