80 karma · joined March 9, 2017
>>Our decision is based on a careful review and the fact that you have submitted a high number of proposals for jobs on our site without many contracts or earnings. Unfortunately, this means the jobs posted by clients are not a good match for your skills.
I see absolutely no correlation between a high rate of proposals and a good match of skills. In what world does a person attempting to gain business loose the ability to keep trying?? I guess it might be time for Upwork to have another competitor.
>Not a fan of what I'm hearing, definitely not a company I'm thinking of pursing.
Which of these statements is true OP?
Who do you think should have the power to decide that?? And why should someone not be able to buy something with money? This sounds like a great way to produce more black markets, and the spending of tax dollars to police it. Not ideal.
And in there statement of use it says: The mark was first used by the applicant, or the applicant's related company, licensee, or predecessor in interest at least as early as 08/22/2016, and first used in commerce at least as early as 08/22/2016, and is now in use in such commerce. The applicant is submitting one specimen for the class showing the mark as used in commerce on or in connection with any item in the class, consisting of a(n) specimen-a.jpg: Screenshot of "www.chowdr.us" website using mark specimen-b.jpg: Screenshot of Google Play Store using mark specimen-c.jpg: Screenshot of Apple App Store using mark.
So if you used it before august 22, 2016 you should fight it!
You might have to make a free account if you don't have one.