220 karma · joined July 9, 2014
It also seems like a very different tech than trying to determine what an ad script will actually show a user. So it's not easy as if they can do A they can do B. Still doesn't excuse the fact that they should be doing their best to block those kind of ads in their ad network.
The description from GitHub is much better, Lelylan is an iot cloud platform based on a lightweight microservices architecture.
Look here www.lelylan.com to get a much better idea about what it is.
In college lectures was from a minimum of 3 hours to maximum of 5 hours depending on how many credit you took in the semester. But the actual learning happened outside of those hours and once again lectures were important only to create the base, maybe even only to provide an introduction to the base.
> Graduating from school (highschool or university) is about learning how to follow directions and play the game.
Really? Is that what college is about, or is that what some colleges have become? The progress from middle school to high school to college is less about learning what's on the board and more about being able to stand on your own among your peers. It gradually moves you from a smaller echo box to a larger and larger one. Until the time you start working and living independently, where the echo box becomes your workplace and the city.
> But you're not even making such a modest claim, you're actually claiming that it is the
I never said that was the only way, but it has been one of the better ways historically. If you know of a better way to teach a good portion of the population critical thinking abilities I am all for it. I am not supporting going to a college with and being $200K in debt when you graduate and still not knowing what you want to do in life. But I am opposed to the fact that the r/hn hivemind thinks that all college is a waste of time.
> Are you aware of how absolutely stupid school seems to peop...
Well good for them, maybe they can broaden their horizons a bit earlier, but what kind of smart people are you talking about? 3 standard deviation from the mean? So the 0.1%? Or 2 sigma? So the 2.3%?
Go there and be happy.
The important thing in high school and college wasn't what I learned in the classroom, although some of it does help me in life. The important this was what I learned in that environment with my peers.
I don't know how bad your college was, but I did go to a pretty good college in my country. It might not compare to ivy league colleges, but it taught me important life lessons none the less. My opinions are biased by my college experience but it sure goes to show that college can be great and not completely useless and a lot of people like to claim.
Most discussion about college not being important is about the fact that we don't use anything we learned in our majors after college, but your major is hardly the important thing to learn in college.
I picked that up somewhere between high school and end of college. Some people may be faster than me but that skill is really important.
Either that, or you don't get to vote.
Edit: The last statement was more about the ability to think critically and less about if you finished high school/college.
The cost of effort their developers will have to put in to be as effective as a LUA developer as they were as a python developer is really not worth this move. There are more to moving to a different platform/language than just the end users.
That was your problem, you just made a huge mistake and depending on how big your python code base was, you have now alienated most of your developers by moving to a language they are not already comfortable with.
Do your customers already have lua installed on their servers or are you bundling it now? You could have just a easily bundled a newer python interpreter. Lua is a nice scripting language, if you want to embed it into another app or to create a plugin system. It's not a nice general purpose scripting language, mostly because of the vast pypi repo.
Seems like you failed to RTFM
That statement is based on my latest information, which is a few months dated, that they couldn't. Things could have changed but it's unlikely.
The app is facing stiff competition in some markets against apps that don't have any subscription model. Even though whatsapp won't actually charge those users the presence of a subscription feature seems to be causing a growth hinderance.
Not sure how it will compete in these markets now given the entrenched nature of social platforms and how hard it is to convince people to switch but that remains to be seen.
Also, until recently whatsapp/facebook couldn't actually read any message sent by users to other users/groups because of the end to end encryption in place. Not sure why they would change that just to get a data mined revenue source, metadata is quite sufficient for that. Even with NSLs on fb in place, the impossibility of of us to read the messages in whatsapp is sufficient reason to deny a NSL request.
Zuck doesn't really interfere with whatsapp, but like with some other things this seems like a bid to increase DAUs and retention instead of any new source of revenue.
The adoption of mobile phones as computing platform is a very different event. It allows use of computing in a very versatile manner. That is why it's usage exploded.
With unlimited computing power we could render real time highly interactive super accurate simulations which takes months to render. But we can't because we don't have the computing power.
The truth is, we are hitting multiple wall at the same time. It's harder to shrink gates any further, it's harder to increase clock speed anymore and it's harder to dissipate the heat generated by the cpus. All the increase we are now getting are incremental not exponential and that is why we can run a current software on a 10 year old cpu, if the software is not optimized for multicore cpus.