Sounds familiar.
939 karma · joined October 16, 2017
Sounds familiar.
The solution might be a system where the driver drives at a higher level of abstraction, but ultimately still drives. Driving should be like declarative programming. For example, the driver still moves the steering wheel left and right, but the car handles the turn. Or when the driver hits the breaks, which is now more of a on/off switch, the car handles the breaking. The role for the driver is to remain engaged, indicating their intention at every moment and for the car to work out the details.
Edit: On second thought, that might end up being worse. I can think of situations where it might become ambiguous to the driver of what they are handling and what the car is handling. Maybe autopilot is all or nothing.
I check on them about twice a year and they are often experimenting with something new.
They have a VR entertainment center here in Australia you can visit called Holoverse.
They also released a web demo a while back which is no longer available, but here is a video of it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlR8AQuIQH4
It's interesting to see all the CPU cores at near 100% utilization and very little on the GPU.
When I can't find something useful through a search engine, I look for the most active subreddit in the topic area and check their wiki. They are often full of well-organized, curated content and FAQs built from years of newbie questions.
Example: r/fitness
My favorite mentioned which Wikipedia article had the longest article name:
Suzukake no Ki no Michi de "Kimi no Hohoemi o Yume ni Miru" to Itte Shimattara Bokutachi no Kankei wa Dō Kawatte Shimau no ka, Bokunari ni Nannichi ka Kangaeta Ue de no Yaya Kihazukashii Ketsuron no Yō na Mono (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzukake_no_Ki_no_Michi_de_%22...)
(Then rescue your father from the belly of the whale, roughly speaking)
(At least Bing has really good image search.)
It is like something to be a human. But the conscious experience of a bat (if it exists) may be completely alien to us in every way. That’s not relevant to what it is to be like a bat. The only important thing is if it is like something to be a bat.
My favourite definition for consciousness is the following:
If it is something to be like a particular thing, then that thing is conscious.
If it is something to be like a bat, then a bat is conscious. If it isn’t something to be like a bat - the “lights are off” so to speak - then it’s not conscious.
Edit: clarity
He doesn’t just think all current experts are wrong, he seems to be one of those rebel doctors who will specifically claim the opposite of any currently accepted fact regarding health and nutrition.
Also, if we work out which plants kinda work, we might be able to isolate the genes that improve survival and add them to other plants.