HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

Pkeod

155 karma · joined April 2, 2012

https://twitter.com/Pkeod
submissionscomments
Pkeod··on The Direct Costs from NPE (Patent Troll) Disputes
Patents are intended to incentivize people to reveal their secrets in exchange for a temporary monopoly on the secrets. They are not meant as vehicles purely for making profit, but that is how they are being abused - by people who buy up patents and then sue anyone who infringes, or by people who patent as broadly as possible and then sue anyone who infringes. Useful for making money, not useful for the intended purpose of contributing work for the greater good of all people.

The patent system is too broken. Anyone who writes software should hate patents. Anything you write will infringe on some patent out there. If all you want is money then writing software isn't the best way to go about getting it.

A better system would be one where patents do not give protection to ideas, but do give minor tax incentives to the people who own and use a related patent in their business. Then their ideas are shared, but not using the patents gives them nothing, and they cannot block others from using the all too often obvious ideas.

Pkeod··on SASS vs. LESS
It's Sass not SASS.

http://sass-lang.com/

Pkeod··on Louis CK does it again - 2 audio shows without DRM at $5 each
Distributing by torrent is different from providing a quality download service with purchase. If someone really wants to download by torrent and wait then what's stopping them from paying and then doing that.

Limiting number of downloads protects their bandwidth from would be jerks. Protecting their service is important for their customers to have a quality experience. It's fair, and most people will only ever download once. If they for some reason use up all 4 downloads and want more they should e-mail them. Why wouldn't give more if some had a genuinely good reason for using up their downloads?

Pkeod··on The frequent fliers who flew too much
I think there are times when selling a lifetime account makes sense. Such as an infrequently used service where the lifetime value of a customer isn't too high. So pricing above the lifetime value would work. For a highly used commodity it does not make sense.
Pkeod··on The guy who made it so difficult to open your bag of potato chips
Shrinkage = shoplifting, employee theft, damaged product, vendor fraud, price errors in favor of customers... the hard plastic shell mitigates all of these.
Pkeod··on 4 Insights from a Hacker News Launch
More proof that asking for donations is not a business model.
Pkeod··on Luadns, managed DNS with Git and Lua scriptable back-end.
My humble suggestions:

Your pricing page "Sign Up" buttons should go to a sign up screen not a sign in screen.

On sign up you should collect credit card information. You will get less sign ups but more revenue, and you won't have to shut off free people if they go over their query quota. Auto upgrade if they do? Send an e-mail saying they are close to meeting their query quota and that they will be auto upgraded if they do?

After sign up you should display a message saying for them to open their e-mail client and click the confirm e-mail - not just a login screen.

Kill the $39 price point. Just have $9, $27, $69 and then below those three have the free option, and explain if they go over their quota they will be upgraded (thus requiring cc information on their account).

← PreviousPage 3 of 3