HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

Podgajski

986 karma · joined October 12, 2023

submissionscomments
Podgajski··on What We Lost When Twitter Became X
I’m wondering what big-ish tech company you work for that is run is not a horrible person…

And just because you let people who have anti-transsexual ideologies speak, does not mean you support them.

Podgajski··on What We Lost When Twitter Became X
> And it's heavily used by people with deeply unpleasant opinions, which tend to be more heavily promoted

There’s absolutely zero evidence for this.

It shipped to the community all right it shifted it from being biased to being more open. I know people don’t like that, but I would prefer an open conversation rather than one dominated by a particular bubble.

There is no right not to listen that exist anywhere. But there is a right to free speech. You can still block people on Twitter all you want are you can even not go onto Twitter. But if you want to be in the public Square and you’re an advocate for free speech, then you can’t tell other people to shut up because it’s invading on your “right to listen“. That has to be the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard and you’re probably one of the people who left Twitter.

Podgajski··on What We Lost When Twitter Became X
In my opinion, it was all organized propaganda. There were people who had very tight control over the narrative on Twitter, because it was not as open to speech as it is now. I discovered the word “zinc“ was being shadow banned during Covid. To me as an amateur researcher that was totally frustrating. But for people who were susceptible to the propaganda anything but the vaccine was a conspiracy theorist.

It was really dominated by left-wing, and by left wing I mean people aligned with the Democrats. Those are most of the people who are upset.

Podgajski··on What We Lost When Twitter Became X
I’m on Twitter and I have not seen any of my news sources or research sources being diminished after must took over.

And the fact that I can actually talk about zinc as being an immuno stimulant now without it being shadow banned is refreshing.

Podgajski··on What We Lost When Twitter Became X
What we lost? Who is this we?
Podgajski··on Drones are the new drug mules
Technology wins again!
Podgajski··on Researchers have identified the enzyme that gives urine its yellow hue
No, probably not. this enzyme from the bacteria in our gut actually is what makes the colorless precursor into the yellow product.

I can imagine there may be a bacteria that reverses this process. Maybe that’s what’s in the cat spray.

Podgajski··on Researchers have identified the enzyme that gives urine its yellow hue
Also, they got Microbiome creates a lot of things. A ton of things.

If you want to go for a real journey, just look at the short chain fatty acids that the Microbiome produces and their effect on water called g protein coupled receptors.

Podgajski··on Researchers have identified the enzyme that gives urine its yellow hue
Then you will be drinking urobilirubin. Probably not much better tasting.
Podgajski··on Researchers have identified the enzyme that gives urine its yellow hue
No, missing the bacteria alone won’t cause jaundice since a lot of the bilirubin will just be extracted from the feces as well.

You need to have high levels of bilirubin being created or a failing liver that can not process it and pass it off into the intestine.

If anything if you’re drinking the same amount of water and your urine turns more yellow, it probably means that you’re producing more bilirubin.

But I don’t know why this is new, I’ve known this intuitively, watching my own body process and health and diet, and noticing that when I excrete more bile, my urine turns more yellow. As does my feces.

Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
But not all the sons rays are coming at the same direction they’re scattered from thousands of different angles. If they came off of the sun, as all polarized, we’d all be dead, burned like a laser, a laser is polarized light.
Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
What Freetail do you think humans are doing?
Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
You’re not a mosquito so you don’t know. You can’t talk to mosquitoes so you don’t know. That’s a scientific fact.
Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
Again, assuming life only exists on earth. You do not care about humanity, you are afraid of your own mortality so you create these science fictions.
Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
How do you know mosquitoes never change their behavior?
Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
Look at yourself importance! So what? It’s different, but is it special? What do you know about the consciousness of a mosquito? Nothing! Because you’re not a mosquito! For all we know, they could be saying the same things about themselves as we are saying, about ourselves, that we are somehow special.

We on on the brink of world war and climate collapse and what role did the mosquito play in this? For we know the mosquitoes have gone past comprehending what a Hicks bozon is and decided it’s much easier to forget about it all and just suck our blood as we continue to overpopulate the planet.

Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
Rare compared to what? We don’t even know what mosquito cognition is so how can we say whether that’s rare in the universe or not? Do you know what it’s like to be a mosquito?

I get the down votes on the previous comment, though, The bias that humans are somehow special and important is so strong it’s hard for us to acknowledge. And I can link that feeling of specialist to the destruction of the environment. And to climate change.

And because I have a different viewpoint than the majority of people here on our existence, does not mean I have an ax to grind, it just means I have a different opinion.

Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
I almost agree with you. However, I’m being a history teacher I’ve discovered that a lot of history books should have been fiction books because they deliberately tried to mislead us and act as propaganda. So the implication does not always match the intent.

Adding the qualification bring some honesty to the writer for the reader. There was a lot of discussion around Covid that was shut down, because people were assuming that the science was, in fact, a truth, and not a theory or even a hypothesis.

Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
I would say we need to teach them about probability, statistics and risk assessment along with “science.”

but I disagree, by changing the wording we are implicitly teaching them what science means.

Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
One thing I always despise about science textbooks Is that they always state theories as facts rather than current theory.

Biology textbook should’ve say “As of today we think that photosynthesis started at so and so date.”

This would do more for science than anything else.

Podgajski··on Fossil evidence of photosynthesis gets a billion years older
What makes human cognition so important? Because you have it?

You are no more special than a mosquito.

Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
You actually just showed that turning unpolarized light into polarized light makes it more powerful by turning it into a laser. And you think I’m trolling?

Just like a laser, The beam from the satellite is concentrated and directed at an area that’s only 15 mi.². If it was spread out like the suns rays were, there would not be enough concentrated power for the stink satellite to pick up the signal. So the EMS from the satellite are acting just like a, The beam from the satellite is concentrated and directed at a area that’s only 15 mi.². If it was spread out like the suns rays were, there would not be enough concentrated power for the starlink satellite to pick up the signal. So the EMS from the satellite are acting just like a powerful laser. What do you think of phased array antenna does? It focuses the energy from the satellite into a single beam, you know, just like a laser!

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02029

Read this paper I’ll post the link again. This explains the difference between polarize and unpolarized EMF.

https://noxtak.com/natural-vs-artificial-electromagnetic-fie....

Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
All right, this is proof that you don’t know what you’re talking about. Light coming off of a lake is not polarized. That’s why we wear polarizing glasses to get rid of the glare. They take the unpolarized light and polarize it by removing everything but the horizontal rays. So they’re doing two things they were reducing the amount of light you’re getting and they’re also polarizing the light reducing glare.

https://www.visionease.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/SunRxT...

Next, Why don’t you read this paper and then tell me if they’re the same. People that are smarter than both of us put together, are talking about these things in a scientific way, not in a way that they think will win an argument.

Besides, we evolved with sunlight, and we did not evolve with man-made EMF. I’m not saying I know this matters, but I’m saying you can’t compare them and say they’re the same.

https://noxtak.com/natural-vs-artificial-electromagnetic-fie....

Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
No, you’re saying that, I’m not saying that you’re saying that. I am saying that if I can pick up a cell signal or if I could pick up a satellite beam from a star satellite then it’s like having a peanut in my mouth.
Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
Actually, I’m measuring it volts per micro. But just because it’s a microwave doesn’t mean it does not have non-thermal effects. This is the question with EHS. And this is what’s being studied, the non-thermal biological effects.

And if the power of the satellite is so low, how can it carry so much data. That’s what you’re not understanding. if it can’t reach the dish it can’t reach me. Those aren’t the waves I’m talking about. As I showed earlier the broadcast cone for the satellite is 15 m² in a hexagon.

Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
In my original question I directly asked “ I’m trying to understand EMF exposure from Starlink satellites. Am I right to assume that anyone within the 15 mile cell area would be exposed to EMFs if someone is using a Starlink receiver?”

I’m not changing anything you are misunderstanding. The phased beam form is directed in area That’s an area of 15 mi.². And a hexagon. I showed you the map and I showed you the link.

You keep saying it’s too weak but two weak compared to what.? there are zero study showing at safety for people with different genetics.

I don’t care what measurement term you use I care about the effect. It’s like saying a drop of cyanide is only a drop.

I’m not trying to keep the thread going. Your answers are nonsensical or you’re just misunderstanding what I’m pointing out. These are being discussed constantly in scientific circles and they’re not answered. But you will come here with, some either knowledge of physics or some propaganda given by cell phone companies and think you know everything and that’s frustrating.

I’m not even saying that I know 100% that these things affect me but your comparisons are illogical. And that’s why I’m keeping going .

Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
And I want to add that it may not worry you, but genetics seems to play a role in electromagnetic hyper sensitivity.

It may have a little effect on you, unless there’s a much higher increase in power, but other people may be more sensitive. It’s like you saying I should not be worried about peanuts when I obviously have a peanut allergy and you don’t.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000647/

Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
You could’ve looked it up yourself, you would learn more if you did.

And as I said, before natural radiation is different from anthropological EMF radiation. It’s post and it’s polarized. You can’t compare it to anything natural.

While natural unpolarised EMF/EMR at any intensity cannot induce any specific/coherent oscillation on these molecules, polarized man-made EMFs/EMR will induce a coherent forced-oscillation on every charged/polar molecule within biological tissue. This is fundamental to our understanding of the biological phenomena.

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914#:~:text=While%20na....

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562392/

Thus, in addition to polarization and coherence, the existence of ELFs is a common feature of almost all human-made EMFs. The present study reviews the DNA damage and related effects induced by human-made EMFs. The ion forced-oscillation mechanism for irregular gating of voltage-gated ion channels on cell membranes by polarized/coherent EMFs is extensively described. Dysfunction of ion channels disrupts intracellular ionic concentrations, which determine the cell's electrochemical balance and homeostasis. The present study shows how this can result in DNA damage through reactive oxygen species/free radical overproduction.

Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
Yes that’s at the dish but I’m wondering the 15 miles around the dish which I have confirmed from someone who is knowledged on the subject that it does transmit that same power over 15 mi.². So essentially it’s exposing me to five bars of 5G millimeter wave radiation over 15 mi.² does that sound right?
Podgajski··on Ask HN: EMF Exposure from Starlink Satellites?
I’m not talking about the terminal, I’m talking about the satellite that’s acting as a cell tower.
← PreviousPage 5 of 17Next →