”The company was founded in November 1990 as Advanced RISC Machines Ltd and structured as a joint venture between Acorn Computers, Apple Computer (now Apple Inc.) and VLSI Technology.”
101 karma · joined February 14, 2017
”The company was founded in November 1990 as Advanced RISC Machines Ltd and structured as a joint venture between Acorn Computers, Apple Computer (now Apple Inc.) and VLSI Technology.”
"The Microsoft Alternatives project (MAlt) started a year ago to mitigate anticipated software license fee increases. MAlt’s objective is to put us back in control using open software."
"A prime example is that CERN has enjoyed special conditions for the use of Microsoft products for the last 20 years, by virtue of its status as an “academic institution”. However, recently, the company has decided to revoke CERN’s academic status, a measure that took effect at the end of the previous contract in March 2019, replaced by a new contract based on user numbers, increasing the license costs by more than a factor of ten. Although CERN has negotiated a ramp-up profile over ten years to give the necessary time to adapt, such costs are not sustainable."
I wouldn’t call the Silva expensive. Probably hard too find something cheaper that feels better, quality wise, than even a Nespresso-machine.
docker pull ubuntu@sha256:45b23dee08af5e43a7fea6c4cf9c25ccf269ee113168c19722f87876677c5cb2
Yeah, throw that code over to the ops team. Let them figure stuff out themselves.
Pretty sure my next laptop won’t be from Apple unless the prices for upgrades come way down, or drives/memory can be replaced. Paying 3-4000 euro for a new laptop with limited lifetime is not an option.
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/amber/pattern-match....
I usually rename the test class of the old implementation to OldXTest and try to keep the interface of the new code similar enough to enable a reasonably quick transition into the new code with proper unit testing.
Redis, Postgres, Rabbitmq and Memcached just to run a chat?
You also get a network namespace, process namespace, user namespace and ability to set cpu/memory limits.
Since you would have a container for each application, you have an easier time setting and testing restrictive apparmor/selinux capabilities and even get some hardening out of the box.
Sure you could get them without containers, but the whole benefit is doing it in a standard, easy way.
For ambient/classical music Spotify is already doing it. Placing an order on music they believe their subscribers would like from unknown artists.
Yeah, BTB tagging is probably a lot better than flushing performance wise.